From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: kgunda@codeaurora.org
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mka@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: pm6150: Add PM6150/PM6150L PMIC peripherals
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 07:37:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5db9a047.1c69fb81.85ac7.7aa1@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ec773e0d92571c4bbed44eeb65cff5@codeaurora.org>
Quoting kgunda@codeaurora.org (2019-10-30 00:06:05)
> On 2019-10-29 22:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2019-10-23 02:02:16)
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..20eb928e5ce3
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6150.dtsi
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> >> +// Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> +
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
> >> +
> >> +&spmi_bus {
> >> + pm6150_lsid0: pmic@0 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,pm6150", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> >> + reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> +
> >> + pm6150_pon: pon@800 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,pm8998-pon";
> >> + reg = <0x800>;
> >> + mode-bootloader = <0x2>;
> >> + mode-recovery = <0x1>;
> >
> > Can this have status = "disabled"? Or is the idea that if the pmic
> > power
> > button isn't used it should be disabled in the board dts file?
> >
> Yes. The idea is to go with latter option. Disable it in the board dts
> file if the
> pmic power button is not used.
Ok. Thanks.
> >> +
> >> + interrupt-names = "pm6150_gpio1",
> >> "pm6150_gpio2",
> >> + "pm6150_gpio3",
> >> "pm6150_gpio4",
> >> + "pm6150_gpio5",
> >> "pm6150_gpio6",
> >> + "pm6150_gpio7",
> >> "pm6150_gpio8",
> >> + "pm6150_gpio9",
> >> "pm6150_gpio10";
> >
> > And this? And have gpio-ranges and use the irqdomain work. Basically,
> > should look like pm8998.
> Ok.. We can go ahead with the pm8998 way as well. We will address it in
> next series.
Yes please use the pm8998 way..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 9:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] Add device tree support for sc7180 Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] dt-bindings: qcom: Add SC7180 bindings Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-25 19:50 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-04 6:03 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: dts: sc7180: Add minimal dts/dtsi files for SC7180 soc Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-29 16:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-11-04 6:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: update binding for qcom sc7180 SoC Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-25 19:51 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-04 6:04 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-29 16:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-11-04 6:11 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64: dts: sc7180: Add device node for apps_smmu Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cmd_db reserved area Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 12:16 ` Sibi Sankar
2019-10-24 2:30 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add rpmh-rsc node Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add SPMI PMIC arbiter device Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-29 16:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-10-30 6:06 ` kgunda
2019-10-30 14:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-11-04 6:10 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: pm6150: Add PM6150/PM6150L PMIC peripherals Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-29 16:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-10-30 7:06 ` kgunda
2019-10-30 14:37 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-idp: Add RPMh regulators Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: SC7180: Add node for rpmhcc clock driver Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-23 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pdc interrupt controller Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-25 19:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-11-04 6:03 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-10-29 16:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-10-30 19:50 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-11-04 6:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-11-04 6:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-11-04 6:56 ` Rajendra Nayak
2019-11-04 7:10 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-11-05 0:34 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5db9a047.1c69fb81.85ac7.7aa1@mx.google.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).