linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, reclaim: make should_continue_reclaim perform dryrun detection
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:44:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60b15fed-2110-c783-d48c-20a1d45f354d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6e25e52-bb02-6d79-b9fd-3acc8358ec45@oracle.com>

On 7/31/19 11:11 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 7/31/19 4:08 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> I agree this is an improvement overall, but perhaps the patch does too
>> many things at once. The reshuffle is one thing and makes sense. The
>> change of the last return condition could perhaps be separate. Also
>> AFAICS the ultimate result is that when nr_reclaimed == 0, the function
>> will now always return false. Which makes the initial test for
>> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL and the comments there misleading. There will no
>> longer be a full LRU scan guaranteed - as long as the scanned LRU chunk
>> yields no reclaimed page, we abort.
> 
> Can someone help me understand why nr_scanned == 0 guarantees a full
> LRU scan?  FWICS, nr_scanned used in this context is only incremented
> in shrink_page_list and potentially shrink_zones.  In the stall case I
> am looking at, there are MANY cases in which nr_scanned is only a few
> pages and none of those are reclaimed.
> 
> Can we not get nr_scanned == 0 on an arbitrary chunk of the LRU?
> 
> I must be missing something, because I do not see how nr_scanned == 0
> guarantees a full scan.

Yeah, seems like it doesn't. More reasons to update/remove the comment.
Can be a followup cleanup if you don't want to block the series.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-01  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 17:50 [RFC PATCH 0/3] fix hugetlb page allocation stalls Mike Kravetz
2019-07-24 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm, reclaim: make should_continue_reclaim perform dryrun detection Mike Kravetz
2019-07-25  8:05   ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-26  8:12     ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-31 11:08     ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-31 12:25       ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-31 21:11       ` Mike Kravetz
2019-08-01  8:44         ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2019-07-24 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: use MIN_COMPACT_COSTLY_PRIORITY everywhere for costly orders Mike Kravetz
2019-07-25  8:06   ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-31 12:06   ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-31 20:30     ` Mike Kravetz
2019-08-01 13:01       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-01 20:33         ` Mike Kravetz
2019-08-02 10:20           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-02 12:05           ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-08-02 17:44             ` Mike Kravetz
2019-07-24 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] hugetlbfs: don't retry when pool page allocations start to fail Mike Kravetz
2019-07-25  8:13   ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-25 17:15     ` Mike Kravetz
2019-07-25 22:43       ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-31 13:23       ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-07-31 21:13         ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60b15fed-2110-c783-d48c-20a1d45f354d@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).