linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:17:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62DB118D-3923-42E8-B3D2-3DF98F9A84C7@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKT2mW0xVZltBOSh@gmail.com>

:)

On May 19, 2021 4:29:29 AM PDT, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@zytor.com>
>> 
>> This patchset addresses several inconsistencies in the handling of
>> system call numbers in x86-64 (and x32).
>
>>  arch/x86/entry/common.c                         |  93 +++--
>>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S                       |   2 +-
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h                  |   2 +-
>>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 488
>+++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  4 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
>Thanks Peter - this series is really nice now, and I agree that this 
>inconsistency should be fixed.
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18 19:12 [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-18 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/syscall: update and extend selftest syscall_numbering_64 H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Update and extend syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/syscall: simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering.c H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/syscall: add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering.c H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/syscall: sign-extend system calls on entry to int H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry/64: Sign-extend " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/syscall: treat out of range and gap system calls the same H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Treat " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/syscall: use int everywhere for system call numbers H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20  8:53   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-21 21:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-22 13:19       ` David Laight
2021-05-25  8:13   ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-19 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls Ingo Molnar
2021-05-19 16:17   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62DB118D-3923-42E8-B3D2-3DF98F9A84C7@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).