Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list

["Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>]

Hi,

On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
> 
>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch.
> 
>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
>>> I tried using git am but get:
>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@
>>> error: could not build fake ancestor
>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>
>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
>>
>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right?
> 
> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge
> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
> rebase it like before.
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 

Can this event update be accepted?

Thanks
Jin Yao