From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v2] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:23:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eaf31c0-0c94-6248-2ace-79e7c923a569@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607204712.594DE00A@viggo.jf.intel.com>
On 06/07/2016 10:47 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so
> that they go upstream for 4.8?
I believe we still don't have up-to-date man pages, right?
Best from my POV to send them out in parallel with the
implementation.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 20:47 [PATCH 0/9] [v2] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, pkeys: add fault handling for PF_PK page fault bit Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: implement new pkey_mprotect() system call Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86, pkeys: make mprotect_key() mask off additional vm_flags Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, pkeys: allocation/free syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86, pkeys: add pkey set/get syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 7/9] generic syscalls: wire up memory protection keys syscalls Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 21:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 8/9] pkeys: add details of system call use to Documentation/ Dave Hansen
2016-06-07 20:47 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, pkeys: add self-tests Dave Hansen
2016-06-08 9:23 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2016-06-08 17:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] [v2] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6eaf31c0-0c94-6248-2ace-79e7c923a569@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).