Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout

From: Qian Cai <qcai@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:06:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <782e710eac32b1ab3bf9713bcd6afcbc9483e16c.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210110153956.GD1106298@kernel.org>

On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:39 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then
> > > fffffffffffffffe
> > > is "accessed" from VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> > > 
> > > It seems to me that we are not initializing struct pages for holes at the
> > > node
> > > boundaries because zones are already clamped to exclude those holes.
> > > 
> > > Can you please try to see if the patch below will produce any useful info:
> > 
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 8c, epfn: 9b, zone: DMA, node:
> > 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 1f7be, epfn: 1f9fe, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 28784, epfn: 288e4, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 298b9, epfn: 298bd, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29923, epfn: 29931, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29933, epfn: 29941, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29945, epfn: 29946, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29ff9, epfn: 2a823, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 33a23, epfn: 33a53, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 78000, epfn: 100000, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > ...
> > [  572.222563][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47f380 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  590.570032][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47ffff is poisoned
> > [  604.268653][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  604.611698][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ffbc is poisoned
> > [  617.484205][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  618.212344][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ffff is poisoned
> > [  633.134228][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  633.874087][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ffff is poisoned
> > [  647.686412][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  648.425548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ffff is poisoned
> > [  663.692630][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  664.432671][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ffff is poisoned
> > [  675.462757][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  676.202548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ffff is poisoned
> > [  687.121605][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  687.860981][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ffff is poisoned
> 
> The e820 map has a hole near the end of each node and these holes are not
> initialized with init_unavailable_range() after it was interleaved with
> memmap initialization because such holes are not accounted by
> zone->spanned_pages.
> 
> Yet, I'm still cannot really understand how this never triggered 
> 
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);
> 
> before v5.7 as all the struct pages for these holes would have zone=0 and
> node=0 ... 
> 
> @Qian, can you please boot your system with memblock=debug and share the
> logs?
> 

http://people.redhat.com/qcai/memblock.txt