From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, qais.yousef@arm.com,
rickyiu@google.com, wvw@google.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net,
xuewen.yan94@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Skip priority checks with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:31:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <787ac8b6-3df6-0225-e835-c17a56a8d642@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YP6++lClPCQvTLcK@google.com>
On 26/07/2021 15:56, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Thursday 22 Jul 2021 at 10:47:33 (+0200), Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -7393,6 +7403,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>
>>> if (likely(p)) {
>>> + if (attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS)
>>> + get_params(p, &attr);
>>
>> SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS is handled here but SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY
>> outside (before) the `if (likely(p))`?
>
> Because I need to dereference p while SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY doesn't :)
Ah, true. Looked weird though.
But then the SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY condition can be placed closer to
the SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS condition. We don't have to set
SETPARAM_POLICY if p == NULL.
>>> retval = sched_setattr(p, &attr);
>>> put_task_struct(p);
>>> }
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-19 16:16 [PATCH v4 0/2] A couple of uclamp fixes Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sched: Fix UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE setting Quentin Perret
2021-07-21 10:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-07-21 13:09 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-22 8:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-07-27 14:32 ` Qais Yousef
2021-07-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Skip priority checks with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS Quentin Perret
2021-07-22 8:47 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-07-26 13:56 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-27 10:16 ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-29 17:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-07-29 17:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=787ac8b6-3df6-0225-e835-c17a56a8d642@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rickyiu@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).