linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	raistlin@linux.it, iwtbavbm@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] sched/deadline: Optimize sched_dl_global_validate()
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 23:48:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d21ee792cc48ff79e8cd62a5f26208463684d6.1602171061.git.iwtbavbm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1602171061.git.iwtbavbm@gmail.com>

Under CONFIG_SMP, dl_bw is per root domain, but not per CPU.
When checking or updating dl_bw, currently iterating every CPU is
overdoing, just need iterate each root domain once.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  9 +++++++++
 kernel/sched/topology.c |  1 +
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index c19c1883d695..365e5fec8c28 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -97,6 +97,17 @@ static inline unsigned long dl_bw_capacity(int i)
 		return __dl_bw_capacity(i);
 	}
 }
+
+static inline bool dl_bw_visited(int cpu, u64 gen)
+{
+	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(cpu)->rd;
+
+	if (rd->visit_gen == gen)
+		return true;
+
+	rd->visit_gen = gen;
+	return false;
+}
 #else
 static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
 {
@@ -112,6 +123,11 @@ static inline unsigned long dl_bw_capacity(int i)
 {
 	return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
 }
+
+static inline bool dl_bw_visited(int cpu, u64 gen)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif
 
 static inline
@@ -2514,11 +2530,15 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class
 	.update_curr		= update_curr_dl,
 };
 
+/* Used for dl_bw check and update. */
+static u64 dl_generation;
+
 int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
 {
 	u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime();
 	u64 period = global_rt_period();
 	u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
+	u64 gen = ++dl_generation;
 	struct dl_bw *dl_b;
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -2527,13 +2547,13 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
 	 * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
 	 * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
 	 * any of the root_domains.
-	 *
-	 * FIXME: Cycling on all the CPUs is overdoing, but simpler than
-	 * cycling on root_domains... Discussion on different/better
-	 * solutions is welcome!
 	 */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		rcu_read_lock_sched();
+
+		if (dl_bw_visited(cpu, gen))
+			goto next;
+
 		dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
@@ -2541,6 +2561,7 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 
+next:
 		rcu_read_unlock_sched();
 
 		if (ret)
@@ -2566,6 +2587,7 @@ static void init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 {
 	u64 new_bw = -1;
+	u64 gen = ++dl_generation;
 	struct dl_bw *dl_b;
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -2576,11 +2598,14 @@ void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 	if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
 		new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 
-	/*
-	 * FIXME: As above...
-	 */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		rcu_read_lock_sched();
+
+		if (dl_bw_visited(cpu, gen)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 28709f6b0975..ce527b981e61 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -801,6 +801,15 @@ struct root_domain {
 	struct dl_bw		dl_bw;
 	struct cpudl		cpudl;
 
+	/*
+	 * Indicate whether a root_domain's dl_bw has been checked or
+	 * updated. It's monotonously increasing.
+	 *
+	 * Also, some corner cases, like 'wrap around' is dangerous, but given
+	 * that u64 is 'big enough'. So that shouldn't be a concern.
+	 */
+	u64 visit_gen;
+
 #ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI
 	/*
 	 * For IPI pull requests, loop across the rto_mask.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index dd7770226086..90f3e5558fa2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static int init_rootdomain(struct root_domain *rd)
 	init_irq_work(&rd->rto_push_work, rto_push_irq_work_func);
 #endif
 
+	rd->visit_gen = 0;
 	init_dl_bw(&rd->dl_bw);
 	if (cpudl_init(&rd->cpudl) != 0)
 		goto free_rto_mask;
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-08 15:47 [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/deadline: Fix and optimize sched_dl_global_validate() Peng Liu
2020-10-08 15:48 ` Peng Liu [this message]
2020-10-29 10:51   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/deadline: Optimize sched_dl_global_validate() tip-bot2 for Peng Liu
2020-10-08 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] sched/deadline: Fix sched_dl_global_validate() Peng Liu
2020-10-29 10:51   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peng Liu
2020-10-14 13:32 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] sched/deadline: Fix and optimize sched_dl_global_validate() Juri Lelli
2020-10-18  8:27   ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78d21ee792cc48ff79e8cd62a5f26208463684d6.1602171061.git.iwtbavbm@gmail.com \
    --to=iwtbavbm@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).