From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paul Gofman <gofmanp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] seccomp: Implement syscall isolation based on memory areas
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 20:26:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85367hkl06.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AF65147C-15DB-4BA4-A08B-55676B489BA5@amacapital.net> (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Sat, 30 May 2020 15:09:47 -0700")
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
>> On May 29, 2020, at 11:00 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Modern Windows applications are executing system call instructions
>> directly from the application's code without going through the WinAPI.
>> This breaks Wine emulation, because it doesn't have a chance to
>> intercept and emulate these syscalls before they are submitted to Linux.
>>
>> In addition, we cannot simply trap every system call of the application
>> to userspace using PTRACE_SYSEMU, because performance would suffer,
>> since our main use case is to run Windows games over Linux. Therefore,
>> we need some in-kernel filtering to decide whether the syscall was
>> issued by the wine code or by the windows application.
>
> Do you really need in-kernel filtering? What if you could have
> efficient userspace filtering instead? That is, set something up so
> that all syscalls, except those from a special address, are translated
> to CALL thunk where the thunk is configured per task. Then the thunk
> can do whatever emulation is needed.
Hi,
I suggested something similar to my customer, by using
libsyscall-intercept. The idea would be overwritting the syscall
instruction with a call to the entry point. I'm not a specialist on the
specifics of Windows games, (cc'ed Paul Gofman, who can provide more
details on that side), but as far as I understand, the reason why that
is not feasible is that the anti-cheat protection in games will abort
execution if the binary region was modified either on-disk or in-memory.
Is there some mechanism to do that without modiyfing the application?
> Getting the details and especially the interaction with any seccomp
> filters that may be installed right could be tricky, but the performance
> should be decent, at least on non-PTI systems.
>
> (If we go this route, I suspect that the correct interaction with
> seccomp is that this type of redirection takes precedence over seccomp
> and seccomp filters are not invoked for redirected syscalls. After all,
> a redirected syscall is, functionally, not a syscall at all.)
>
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-31 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 5:59 [PATCH RFC] seccomp: Implement syscall isolation based on memory areas Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-30 17:30 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-31 5:56 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-31 12:39 ` Paul Gofman
2020-05-31 16:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-31 17:10 ` Paul Gofman
2020-05-31 17:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-31 18:01 ` Paul Gofman
2020-06-01 17:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-06-01 17:53 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-30 22:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-31 0:26 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2020-05-31 0:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-31 12:56 ` Paul Gofman
2020-05-31 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-31 18:36 ` Paul Gofman
2020-05-31 18:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-31 19:37 ` Paul Gofman
2020-05-31 21:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-01 18:06 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-06-01 20:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-01 23:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-11 19:38 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-05-31 23:33 ` Brendan Shanks
2020-06-01 1:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-25 23:14 ` Robert O'Callahan
2020-06-25 23:48 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2020-06-26 1:03 ` Robert O'Callahan
2020-06-05 6:06 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-06-01 9:23 Billy Laws
2020-06-01 13:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-06-01 17:48 ` hpa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85367hkl06.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=gofmanp@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).