From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:33:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85f9074a-064c-acbc-2a22-968026f0a8c3@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f878a00c-5d84-534b-deac-5736534a61cd@redhat.com>
On 7/23/19 4:30 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/22/19 8:46 AM, peter enderborg wrote:
>> On 7/2/19 8:37 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> Currently, a value of '1" is written to /sys/kernel/slab/<slab>/shrink
>>> file to shrink the slab by flushing all the per-cpu slabs and free
>>> slabs in partial lists. This applies only to the root caches, though.
>>>
>>> Extends this capability by shrinking all the child memcg caches and
>>> the root cache when a value of '2' is written to the shrink sysfs file.
>>>
>>> On a 4-socket 112-core 224-thread x86-64 system after a parallel kernel
>>> build, the the amount of memory occupied by slabs before shrinking
>>> slabs were:
>>>
>>> # grep task_struct /proc/slabinfo
>>> task_struct 7114 7296 7744 4 8 : tunables 0 0
>>> 0 : slabdata 1824 1824 0
>>> # grep "^S[lRU]" /proc/meminfo
>>> Slab: 1310444 kB
>>> SReclaimable: 377604 kB
>>> SUnreclaim: 932840 kB
>>>
>>> After shrinking slabs:
>>>
>>> # grep "^S[lRU]" /proc/meminfo
>>> Slab: 695652 kB
>>> SReclaimable: 322796 kB
>>> SUnreclaim: 372856 kB
>>> # grep task_struct /proc/slabinfo
>>> task_struct 2262 2572 7744 4 8 : tunables 0 0
>>> 0 : slabdata 643 643 0
>>
>> What is the time between this measurement points? Should not the shrinked memory show up as reclaimable?
>
> In this case, I echoed '2' to all the shrink sysfs files under
> /sys/kernel/slab. The purpose of shrinking caches is to reclaim as much
> unused memory slabs from all the caches, irrespective if they are
> reclaimable or not.
Well, SReclaimable counts pages allocated by kmem caches with
SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT flags, which should match those that have a shrinker
associated and can thus actually reclaim objects. That shrinking slabs affected
SReclaimable just a bit while reducing SUnreclaim by more than 50% looks
certainly odd.
For example the task_struct cache is not a reclaimable one, yet shows massive
reduction. Could be that the reclaimable objects were pinning non-reclaimable
ones, so the shrinking had secondary effects in non-reclaimable caches.
> We do not reclaim any used objects. That is why we
> see the numbers were reduced in both cases.
>
> Cheers,
> Longman
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-02 18:37 [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches Waiman Long
2019-07-02 18:39 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 19:09 ` David Rientjes
2019-07-02 19:15 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 19:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-07-02 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-02 20:44 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-03 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-03 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 16:16 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-04 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 13:12 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-03 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 15:14 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-03 16:10 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-07-03 16:13 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-22 12:46 ` peter enderborg
2019-07-23 14:30 ` Waiman Long
2019-08-07 16:33 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85f9074a-064c-acbc-2a22-968026f0a8c3@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.enderborg@sony.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).