From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:50:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rld8mic.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466090332.24747.9255471295044653085.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> @@ -534,7 +537,7 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc(unsigned long node,
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
> if (depth == 1 &&
> strcmp(uname, "ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory") == 0) {
> - walk_drmem_lmbs_early(node, early_init_drmem_lmb);
> + walk_drmem_lmbs_early(node, NULL, early_init_drmem_lmb);
walk_drmem_lmbs_early() can now fail. Should this failure be propagated
as a return value of early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc()?
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
<snip>
> @@ -787,7 +790,7 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
> */
> memory = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
> if (memory) {
> - walk_drmem_lmbs(memory, numa_setup_drmem_lmb);
> + walk_drmem_lmbs(memory, NULL, numa_setup_drmem_lmb);
Similarly here. Now that this call can fail, should
parse_numa_properties() handle or propagate the failure?
> of_node_put(memory);
> }
>
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-13 17:20 [PATCH v3 00/12] ppc64: enable kdump support for kexec_file_load syscall Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 21:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] powerpc/kexec_file: mark PPC64 specific code Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 1:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 4:46 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 18:34 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] powerpc/kexec_file: add helper functions for getting memory ranges Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 23:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:08 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:32 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 20:00 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 2:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:58 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 3:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:01 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 22:52 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 4:17 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:11 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup the stack for purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 0:35 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 1:38 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ppc64/kexec_file: prepare elfcore header for crashing kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 2:22 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:07 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add appropriate regions for memory reserve map Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 2:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ppc64/kexec_file: fix kexec load failure with lack of memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 5:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rld8mic.fsf@morokweng.localdomain \
--to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).