From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
michal.lkml@markovi.net, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir from system
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 08:06:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875a75ec-bbf1-9d80-a3e1-9c759c9c05e1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031071839.GB3130@Gentoo>
On 10/31/19 12:18 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 22:27 Wed 30 Oct 2019, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/30/19 9:52 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>>>>> That 'rm' doesn't remove any files. Compare what remove_old_kernel() does.
>>>>> No,it is not using that function rather take the parameter from the
>>>>> commandline and get into boot dir match with it and remove it.
>>>>
>>>> But it doesn't do that. I tested it. It should be more like what
>>>> rmeove_old_kernel() does:
>>>>
>>>> rm -If vmlinuz-$kernel_ver System.map-$kernel_ver config-$kernel_ver
>>>>
>>>> and if not, please explain why not.
>>> Okay, again some uniformity missing in the code, I would like to your
>>> suggested method,i.e call remove_old_kernel to do the job instead of depending on individual kernel.
>>
>> The simplest thing to do is set kernel_version=$kernel_ver
>> and then call remove_old_kernel().
>> And set modules_version=$modules_dir_name and call remove_old_modules_dir().
>>
>> But it would be cleaner to pass a parameter (kernel_version) to the
>> remove_old_kernel() function and to pass a parameter (modules_dir) to the
>> remove_old_modules_dir() function.
>
>>
>
> Thank you...I have just modified the code and call both the function
> under remove option. BTW I didn't set the extra variable $kernel_ver name it $kernel_version and instead of $modules_dir_name name it $mo
> dules_version.
>
> Capturing command line parameter in $kernel_version and $modules_version
>
> Is that fine? Here is a code snippet:
Yes, that should be OK.
> -r | --remove)
> if [[ $# -ne 3 ]]; then
> printf "You need to provide kernel version and modules directory
> name \n"
> exit 1
> else
> remove_old_kernel
> remove_old_modules_dir
> fi
>
>
> I have just test it and it works.
>
>
> And about solitary r option without hypen is ignoring and doing nothing.
>
> Means, if I pass ./scripts/prune-kernel r 5.3.3
> it simply ignore and does nothing.Only with the hypen it can work.
Is that how it should be?
or what would you expect that to do?
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 9:54 [PATCH] scripts: prune-kernel:remove old kernels and modules dir from system Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-31 2:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-10-31 3:37 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-31 4:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-10-31 4:52 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-31 5:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-10-31 7:18 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-10-31 15:06 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2019-11-01 4:23 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-01 5:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-01 5:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-02 6:30 [PATCH] scripts:prune-kernel:remove " Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-05 2:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-05 2:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-11-05 4:39 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-05 4:52 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-06 2:53 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-11-06 3:10 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-06 4:03 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-11-06 4:29 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-06 4:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-11-06 4:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-11-06 4:42 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-06 19:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-11-06 22:39 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-09 7:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-11-09 11:13 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-15 1:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-11-15 15:21 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2019-11-18 7:30 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-11-05 4:33 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875a75ec-bbf1-9d80-a3e1-9c759c9c05e1@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).