linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] sched/isolation: isolate from handling managed interrupt
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:13:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zgmzpd8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203235743.GH155875@xz-x1>

Peter,

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 11:15:50PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> No, really. The basic guarantee is that your new kernel is going to work
>> fine with the previous command line, but making a guarantee that new
>> command line options still work on an old kernel are just creating a
>> horrible mess. So if that command line interface was not designed to
>> handle unknown arguments in the first place, you better fix that.
>
> Hi, Thomas,
>
> Just to make sure I understand it right: are you suggesting that we
> fix up housekeeping_isolcpus_setup() to be able to skip unknown sub
> parameters?

Exactly.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-04  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20  9:16 [PATCH V4] sched/isolation: isolate from handling managed interrupt Ming Lei
2020-01-22 13:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-03 19:21   ` Peter Xu
2020-02-03 23:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-03 23:57       ` Peter Xu
2020-02-04  9:13         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-01-22 15:34 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq, sched/isolation: Isolate from handling managed interrupts tip-bot2 for Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875zgmzpd8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).