From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 18:51:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dewmy5v.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929221012.228270-9-frederic@kernel.org>
On 30/09/21 00:10, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The current condition to limit the number of callbacks executed in a
> row checks the offloaded state of the rdp. Not only is it volatile
> but it is also misleading: the rcu_core() may well be executing
> callbacks concurrently with NOCB kthreads, and the offloaded state
> would then be verified on both cases. As a result the limit would
> spuriously not apply anymore on softirq while in the middle of
> (de-)offloading process.
>
> Another issue with the condition is that rcu_is_callbacks_kthread()
> doesn't check if we are actually running callbacks from rcuc itself or
> from a softirq interrupting rcuc.
>
Doesn't rcutree.use_softirq imply rcuc is never woken, in which case
RCU_SOFTIRQ can't interrupt rcuc (e.g. while run atop an IRQ exit)?
I suppose during the (de)offload sequence we could have RCU_SOFTIRQ running
atop the NOCB CB kthread, but that's not something
rcu_is_callbacks_kthread() detects.
Also, why is rcu_is_callbacks_kthread() hardcoded to false for
!CONFIG_RCU_BOOST? Isn't it relevant for do_rcu_batch() ratelimiting
regardless (at least before your patches)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 22:10 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu/nocb: Make local rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() safe against concurrent deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu/nocb: Prepare state machine for a new step Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 11:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu/nocb: Invoke rcu_core() at the start of deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 12:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration preempt-safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration (de-)offloading safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] rcu/nocb: Check a stable offloaded state to manipulate qlen_last_fqs_check Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu/nocb: Use appropriate rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-10-04 13:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-05 20:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu: Apply callbacks processing time limit only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-06 15:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-07 0:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Don't invoke local rcu core on callback overload from nocb kthread Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-30 15:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-11 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:47 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes Valentin Schneider
2021-10-08 14:03 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-08 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-06 15:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-07 8:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-07 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-11 14:51 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-11 14:51 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dewmy5v.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).