linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: gcc-10: kernel stack is corrupted and fails to boot
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:50:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d078tjl0.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1vq4qev.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (Kalle Valo's message of "Mon, 11 May 2020 15:17:12 +0300")

(trimming CC, changing title)

Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:

> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
>
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>>
>>> gcc-10 correctly points out a bug with a zero-length array in
>>> struct ath10k_pci:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c: In function 'ath10k_ahb_remove':
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c:30:9: error: array subscript 0
>>> is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct
>>> ath10k_ahb[0]' [-Werror=zero-length-bounds]
>>>    30 |  return &((struct ath10k_pci *)ar->drv_priv)->ahb[0];
>>>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c:13:
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.h:185:20: note: while referencing 'ahb'
>>>   185 |  struct ath10k_ahb ahb[0];
>>>       |                    ^~~
>>>
>>> The last addition to the struct ignored the comments and added
>>> new members behind the array that must remain last.
>>>
>>> Change it to a flexible-array member and move it last again to
>>> make it work correctly, prevent the same thing from happening
>>> again (all compilers warn about flexible-array members in the
>>> middle of a struct) and get it to build without warnings.
>>
>> Very good find, thanks! This bug would cause all sort of strange memory
>> corruption issues.
>
> This motivated me to switch to using GCC 10.x and I noticed that you had
> already upgraded crosstool so it was a trivial thing to do, awesome :)
>
> https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

And now I have a problem :) I first noticed that my x86 testbox is not
booting when I compile the kernel with GCC 10.1.0 from crosstool. I
didn't get any error messages so I just downgraded the compiler and the
kernel was booting fine again. Next I decided to try GCC 10.1 with my
x86 laptop and it also failed to boot, but this time I got kernel logs
and saw this:

Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: start_secodary+0x178/0x180

Call Trace:
dump_stack
panic
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
? start_secondary
__stack_chk_fail
start_secondary
secondary_startup

(I wrote the above messages manually from a picture so expect typos)

Then also on my x86 laptop I downgraded the compiler to GCC 8.1.0 (from
crosstool), rebuilt the exactly same kernel version and the kernel
booted without issues.

I'm using 5.7.0-rc4-wt-ath+ which is basically v5.7-rc4 plus latest
wireless patches, and I doubt the wireless patches are making any
difference this early in the boot. All compilers I use are prebuilt
binaries from kernel.org crosstool repo[1] with addition of ccache
v3.4.1 to speed up my builds.

Any ideas? How should I debug this further?

[1] https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-13  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-09 12:06 [PATCH net-next 1/2] ath10k: fix gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warnings Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-09 12:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ath10k: fix ath10k_pci struct layout Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-11 12:05   ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 12:17     ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 12:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13  6:50       ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-05-13  8:49         ` gcc-10: kernel stack is corrupted and fails to boot Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13 12:45           ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-13 13:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13 15:31               ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-13 16:00                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13 16:07                   ` David Laight
2020-05-14  9:13                 ` Harald Arnesen
2020-05-13 15:48         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-13 21:28           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13 21:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-05-13 21:49               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-13 22:20                 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-05-13 22:51                   ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-13 23:13                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 23:36                     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-05-14  0:11                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-14  0:51                         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-14  2:20                           ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-14  3:50                             ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]                               ` <CAHk-=wgiGxRgJGS-zyer1C_x2MQUVo6iZn0=aJyuFTqJWk-mpA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-05-14  5:22                                 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-14  8:40                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-14 13:27                                     ` [PATCH] x86: Fix early boot crash on gcc-10, third try Borislav Petkov
2020-05-14 14:45                                       ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-14 15:50                                     ` gcc-10: kernel stack is corrupted and fails to boot Arvind Sankar
2020-05-14  8:11                             ` David Laight
2020-05-13 23:07                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-09 15:48 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ath10k: fix gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warnings Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-11 12:02   ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 12:46     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-11 13:09       ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 13:47         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-12  7:33 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d078tjl0.fsf_-_@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).