From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
joe@perches.com, keescook@chromium.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
minchan@kernel.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests: add tests_sysfs module
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 16:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsl1iqg0.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yao3vtSKBKLyQY1E@kroah.com>
Greg,
On Fri, Dec 03 2021 at 16:29, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:44:57AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
sorry for missing this thread. I came accross it now as I'm looking into
the licensing mess again.
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1
>
> Again, sorry, but no, I am going to object to this license as you are
> only accessing a GPL-v2-only api. Any other license on a file that
> interacts with that, especially for core stuff like testing the
> functionality of this code, needs to have that same license. Sorry.
That's a bogus argument. First of all the code is dual licensed and
second we have enough code in the kernel which is licensed MIT/BSD and
happily can access the GPL-v2-only APIs.
Aside of that we have already code in the kernel which is dual licensed
GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1
We just can't make it SPDX clean because copyleft-next-0.3.1 is not in
LICENSING.
While I agree that we want to keep the number of licenses as small as
possible, we cannot really dictate which dual licensing options a
submitter selects unless the license is GPL-2.0-only incompatible, which
copyleft-next is not.
Can we just get over this, add the license with the SPDX identifier and
move on?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-22 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 18:44 [PATCH v9 0/6] test_sysfs: add new selftest for sysfs Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-23 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-24 13:59 ` Richard Fontana
2022-05-25 17:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 19:13 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2022-05-25 21:50 ` J Lovejoy
2022-05-25 22:29 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2022-05-23 21:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 16:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 23:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-23 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 16:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 17:05 ` Bird, Tim
2022-05-25 18:11 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 19:05 ` Bird, Tim
2022-05-25 19:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 22:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-06-02 4:11 ` Bird, Tim
2022-06-02 6:20 ` gregkh
2022-06-02 19:41 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-06-02 19:30 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests: add tests_sysfs module Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-03 15:29 ` Greg KH
2021-12-09 1:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-10 21:39 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-14 19:31 ` [copyleft-next] " Richard Fontana
2022-05-22 14:37 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-05-22 14:47 ` Greg KH
2022-05-22 15:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-23 19:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] kernfs: add initial failure injection support Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] test_sysfs: add support to use kernfs failure injection Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] kernel/module: add documentation for try_module_get() Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fsl1iqg0.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).