linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/1] ext4: Optimize file overwrites
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:36:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88e795d8a4d5cd22165c7ebe857ba91d68d8813e.1600401668.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1600401668.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

In case if the file already has underlying blocks/extents allocated
then we don't need to start a journal txn and can directly return
the underlying mapping. Currently ext4_iomap_begin() is used by
both DAX & DIO path. We can check if the write request is an
overwrite & then directly return the mapping information.

This could give a significant perf boost for multi-threaded writes
specially random overwrites.
On PPC64 VM with simulated pmem(DAX) device, ~10x perf improvement
could be seen in random writes (overwrite). Also bcoz this optimizes
away the spinlock contention during jbd2 slab cache allocation
(jbd2_journal_handle). On x86 VM, ~2x perf improvement was observed.

Reported-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 10dd470876b3..6eae17758ece 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3437,14 +3437,26 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
 	map.m_len = min_t(loff_t, (offset + length - 1) >> blkbits,
 			  EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK) - map.m_lblk + 1;
 
-	if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE)
+	if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE) {
+		/*
+		 * We check here if the blocks are already allocated, then we
+		 * don't need to start a journal txn and we can directly return
+		 * the mapping information. This could boost performance
+		 * especially in multi-threaded overwrite requests.
+		 */
+		if (offset + length <= i_size_read(inode)) {
+			ret = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
+			if (ret > 0 && (map.m_flags & EXT4_MAP_MAPPED))
+				goto out;
+		}
 		ret = ext4_iomap_alloc(inode, &map, flags);
-	else
+	} else {
 		ret = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
+	}
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-
+out:
 	ext4_set_iomap(inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.26.2


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18  5:06 [PATCHv3 0/1] Optimize ext4 file overwrites - perf improvement Ritesh Harjani
2020-09-18  5:06 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2020-09-18  7:52   ` [PATCHv3 1/1] ext4: Optimize file overwrites Sedat Dilek
2020-09-18  9:52   ` Jan Kara
2020-09-25  7:12   ` [ext4] 4e8fc10115: fio.write_iops 330.6% improvement kernel test robot
2020-10-03  4:49   ` [PATCHv3 1/1] ext4: Optimize file overwrites Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88e795d8a4d5cd22165c7ebe857ba91d68d8813e.1600401668.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).