From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261947AbSI3HAN>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:00:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261949AbSI3HAM>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:00:12 -0400
Received: from p50825888.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.130.88.136]:24772 "EHLO
	khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261947AbSI3HAL>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:00:11 -0400
Date: 30 Sep 2002 09:01:00 +0200
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <8Xq2wQimw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20020929155051.GF1014@suse.de>
Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh10 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <20020929155051.GF1014@suse.de>
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

axboe@suse.de (Jens Axboe)  wrote on 29.09.02 in <20020929155051.GF1014@suse.de>:

> On Sun, Sep 29 2002, Murray J. Root wrote:

> > None of these have been reported because I haven't had time to do all the
> > work involved in making a report that anyone on the team will read.
>
> But you have time to write this email and complain that it doesn't work?
> -> /dev/null, until you send proper reports.

That was precisely the point, no?

For some people, this goes "bake kernel, make sure nobody is doing  
something critical, reboot, hang, curse, reboot to old kernel, apologize  
for delay, stop fiddling with this thing for today" as the machine in  
question needs to do other stuff.

That's certainly the reason why I haven't figured out yet why our damn  
"new" central server doesn't boot bloody 2.4 without hanging - I certainly  
don't *want* to run 2.2 on that thing. Probably config options.

MfG Kai