Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: rcar-du: Rename var to a more precise name

From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: "open list:DRM DRIVERS FOR RENESAS"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS FOR RENESAS" 
	<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm: rcar-du: Rename var to a more precise name
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 16:49:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ddd8179-a0c7-1fbe-0390-ea8fd8c0ff7b@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532971214-17962-3-git-send-email-jacopo@jmondi.org>

Hi Jacopo,

Thankyou for the patch,

On 30/07/18 18:20, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Rename the 'value' variable, only used to for writing to DMSR register to a
> more precise 'dmsr' name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> index 6d55cec..4d7907c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_set_display_timing(struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc)
>  	const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &rcrtc->crtc.state->adjusted_mode;
>  	struct rcar_du_device *rcdu = rcrtc->group->dev;
>  	unsigned long mode_clock = mode->clock * 1000;
> -	u32 value;
> +	u32 dsmr;
>  	u32 escr;
>  
>  	if (rcdu->info->dpll_ch & (1 << rcrtc->index)) {
> @@ -299,11 +299,11 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_set_display_timing(struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc)
>  	rcar_du_group_write(rcrtc->group, rcrtc->index % 2 ? OTAR2 : OTAR, 0);
>  
>  	/* Signal polarities */
> -	value = ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) ? DSMR_VSL : 0)
> -	      | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC) ? DSMR_HSL : 0)
> -	      | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) ? DSMR_ODEV : 0)
> -	      | DSMR_DIPM_DISP | DSMR_CSPM;
> -	rcar_du_crtc_write(rcrtc, DSMR, value);
> +	dsmr = ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) ? DSMR_VSL : 0)
> +	       | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC) ? DSMR_HSL : 0)
> +	       | ((mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) ? DSMR_ODEV : 0)
> +	       | DSMR_DIPM_DISP | DSMR_CSPM;

Quite nit-picky I'm afraid, but here, you have increased the indent such
that the '|' operator is now aligned with the first '(', rather than the
'=' as used by the rest of the driver.

Was this intentional ?

I think it should be brought forwards to align under the '=' to match.

> +	rcar_du_crtc_write(rcrtc, DSMR, dsmr);
>  
>  	/* Display timings */
>  	rcar_du_crtc_write(rcrtc, HDSR, mode->htotal - mode->hsync_start - 19);
> 