linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: brijesh.singh@amd.com, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:20:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9126c92f-ad3b-a5b6-ac44-416405489a7e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906194710.GA16605@linux.intel.com>



On 09/06/2018 02:47 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
...

>>
>> Yes, the auxiliary array will dumped into the regular .bss when
>> CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT=n. Typically it will be few k, I am not
>> sure if its worth complicating the code to save those extra memory.
>> Most of the distro's have CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT=y anyways.
> 
> I just realized that we'll try to create a bogus array if 'NR_CPUS <=
> HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE'.  A bit ugly, but we could #ifdef away both that
> and CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT=n in a single shot, e.g.:
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT) && NR_CPUS > HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE
> #define HVC_AUX_ARRAY_SIZE  \
> 	PAGE_ALIGN((NR_CPUS - HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE) * \
> 		   sizeof(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info))
> static struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info
> 	hv_clock_aux[HVC_AUX_ARRAY_SIZE] __decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
> #endif
> 

The HVC_BOOT_ARRAY_SIZE macro uses sizeof(..) and to my understanding
the sizeof operators are not allowed in '#if'. Anyway, I will try to see
if it can be used, if not then I will stick to CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
check.

-Brijesh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 11:42 [PATCH v5 0/5] x86: Fix SEV guest regression Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] x86/mm: Restructure sme_encrypt_kernel() Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/mm: fix sme_populate_pgd() to update page flags Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] x86/mm: add .data..decrypted section to hold shared variables Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] x86/kvm: use __decrypted attribute in " Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 11:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 12:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 13:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 14:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 14:44         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 18:37         ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 18:47           ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 19:24             ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 19:46               ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 19:47               ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 20:20                 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2018-09-06 20:39                   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 21:56                     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 14:43       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 14:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 15:19           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 15:54             ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 18:33               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 18:43                 ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 18:45                 ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 19:03                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 17:50       ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-06 14:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-09-06 18:50     ` Brijesh Singh
2018-09-07  3:57       ` Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9126c92f-ad3b-a5b6-ac44-416405489a7e@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).