From: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 25/37] perf evsel: move event open in evsel__open_cpu to separate function
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 23:52:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9506b14fe2965e4145c034715eb10e02f2137f7b.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YS6JBBW3d4pmcy/U@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
thanks for your review and your suggestions, and also for the PRIu64 patch.
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 16:54 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Riccardo Mancini escreveu:
> > This is the final patch splitting evsel__open_cpu.
> > This patch moves the entire loop code to a separate function, to be
> > reused for the multithreaded code.
>
> Are you going to use that 'enum perf_event_open_err' somewhere else?
> I.e. is there a need to expose it in evsel.h?
Yes, in the next patch (26/37). It's being used to expose a function that just
does the perf_event_open calls for an evsel. It needs to return such structure
to provide information about the error (which return code, at which thread).
>
> I'm stopping at this patch to give the ones I merged so far some
> testing, will now push it to tmp.perf/core.
I checked tmp.perf/core and it looks good to me.
I also did some additional tests to check that fallback mechanisms where
working:
check missing pid being ignored (rerun until warning is shown)
$ sudo ./perf bench internals evlist-open-close -i10 -u $UID
check that weak group fallback is working
$ sudo ./perf record -e '{cycles,cache-misses,cache-
references,cpu_clk_unhalted.thread,cycles,cycles,cycles}:W'
check that precision_ip fallback is working:
edited perf-sys.h to make sys_perf_event_open fail if precision_ip > 2
$ sudo ./perf record -e '{cycles,cs}:P'
I've also run perf-test on my machine and it's passing too.
I'm encounteirng one fail on the "BPF filter" test (42), which is present also
in perf/core, so it should not be related to this patch.
Thanks,
Riccardo
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 12 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index 2e95416b8320c6b9..e41f55a7a70ea630 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -1945,6 +1945,82 @@ bool evsel__increase_rlimit(enum rlimit_action
> > *set_rlimit)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct perf_event_open_result perf_event_open(struct evsel *evsel,
> > + pid_t pid, int cpu, int thread,
> > + struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> > + struct perf_thread_map *threads)
> > +{
> > + int fd, group_fd, rc;
> > + struct perf_event_open_result res;
> > +
> > + if (!evsel->cgrp && !evsel->core.system_wide)
> > + pid = perf_thread_map__pid(threads, thread);
> > +
> > + group_fd = get_group_fd(evsel, cpu, thread);
> > +
> > + test_attr__ready();
> > +
> > + pr_debug2_peo("sys_perf_event_open: pid %d cpu %d group_fd %d flags
> > %#lx",
> > + pid, cpus->map[cpu], group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> > +
> > + fd = sys_perf_event_open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpus->map[cpu],
> > + group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> > +
> > + FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = fd;
> > + res.fd = fd;
> > +
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > + rc = -errno;
> > +
> > + pr_debug2_peo("\nsys_perf_event_open failed, error %d\n",
> > + rc);
> > + res.rc = rc;
> > + res.err = PEO_FALLBACK;
> > + return res;
> > + }
> > +
> > + bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, cpu, fd);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled)) {
> > + test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid,
> > + cpus->map[cpu], fd,
> > + group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> > + }
> > +
> > + pr_debug2_peo(" = %d\n", fd);
> > +
> > + if (evsel->bpf_fd >= 0) {
> > + int evt_fd = fd;
> > + int bpf_fd = evsel->bpf_fd;
> > +
> > + rc = ioctl(evt_fd,
> > + PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF,
> > + bpf_fd);
> > + if (rc && errno != EEXIST) {
> > + pr_err("failed to attach bpf fd %d: %s\n",
> > + bpf_fd, strerror(errno));
> > + res.rc = -EINVAL;
> > + res.err = PEO_ERROR;
> > + return res;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we succeeded but had to kill clockid, fail and
> > + * have evsel__open_strerror() print us a nice error.
> > + */
> > + if (perf_missing_features.clockid ||
> > + perf_missing_features.clockid_wrong) {
> > + res.rc = -EINVAL;
> > + res.err = PEO_ERROR;
> > + return res;
> > + }
> > +
> > + res.rc = 0;
> > + res.err = PEO_SUCCESS;
> > + return res;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> > struct perf_thread_map *threads,
> > int start_cpu, int end_cpu)
> > @@ -1952,6 +2028,7 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct
> > perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> > int cpu, thread, nthreads;
> > int pid = -1, err, old_errno;
> > enum rlimit_action set_rlimit = NO_CHANGE;
> > + struct perf_event_open_result peo_res;
> >
> > err = __evsel__prepare_open(evsel, cpus, threads);
> > if (err)
> > @@ -1979,67 +2056,22 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct
> > perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> > for (cpu = start_cpu; cpu < end_cpu; cpu++) {
> >
> > for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
> > - int fd, group_fd;
> > retry_open:
> > if (thread >= nthreads)
> > break;
> >
> > - if (!evsel->cgrp && !evsel->core.system_wide)
> > - pid = perf_thread_map__pid(threads, thread);
> > -
> > - group_fd = get_group_fd(evsel, cpu, thread);
> > -
> > - test_attr__ready();
> > -
> > - pr_debug2_peo("sys_perf_event_open: pid %d cpu %d
> > group_fd %d flags %#lx",
> > - pid, cpus->map[cpu], group_fd, evsel-
> > >open_flags);
> > + peo_res = perf_event_open(evsel, pid, cpu, thread,
> > cpus,
> > + threads);
> >
> > - fd = sys_perf_event_open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpus-
> > >map[cpu],
> > - group_fd, evsel->open_flags);
> > -
> > - FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = fd;
> > -
> > - if (fd < 0) {
> > - err = -errno;
> > -
> > - pr_debug2_peo("\nsys_perf_event_open failed,
> > error %d\n",
> > - err);
> > + err = peo_res.rc;
> > + switch (peo_res.err) {
> > + case PEO_SUCCESS:
> > + set_rlimit = NO_CHANGE;
> > + continue;
> > + case PEO_FALLBACK:
> > goto try_fallback;
> > - }
> > -
> > - bpf_counter__install_pe(evsel, cpu, fd);
> > -
> > - if (unlikely(test_attr__enabled)) {
> > - test_attr__open(&evsel->core.attr, pid, cpus-
> > >map[cpu],
> > - fd, group_fd, evsel-
> > >open_flags);
> > - }
> > -
> > - pr_debug2_peo(" = %d\n", fd);
> > -
> > - if (evsel->bpf_fd >= 0) {
> > - int evt_fd = fd;
> > - int bpf_fd = evsel->bpf_fd;
> > -
> > - err = ioctl(evt_fd,
> > - PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF,
> > - bpf_fd);
> > - if (err && errno != EEXIST) {
> > - pr_err("failed to attach bpf fd %d:
> > %s\n",
> > - bpf_fd, strerror(errno));
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > - goto out_close;
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - set_rlimit = NO_CHANGE;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * If we succeeded but had to kill clockid, fail and
> > - * have evsel__open_strerror() print us a nice error.
> > - */
> > - if (perf_missing_features.clockid ||
> > - perf_missing_features.clockid_wrong) {
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > + default:
> > + case PEO_ERROR:
> > goto out_close;
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > index 0a245afab2d87d74..8c9827a93ac001a7 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> > @@ -282,6 +282,18 @@ int evsel__enable(struct evsel *evsel);
> > int evsel__disable(struct evsel *evsel);
> > int evsel__disable_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu);
> >
> > +enum perf_event_open_err {
> > + PEO_SUCCESS,
> > + PEO_FALLBACK,
> > + PEO_ERROR
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct perf_event_open_result {
> > + enum perf_event_open_err err;
> > + int rc;
> > + int fd;
> > +};
> > +
> > int evsel__open_per_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, int
> > cpu);
> > int evsel__open_per_thread(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_thread_map
> > *threads);
> > int evsel__open(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> > --
> > 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-03 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-21 9:19 [RFC PATCH v1 00/37] perf: use workqueue for evlist operations Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/37] libperf cpumap: improve idx function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 18:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-08 14:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/37] libperf cpumap: improve max function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 18:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-31 19:16 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/37] perf evlist: replace evsel__cpu_iter* functions with evsel__find_cpu Riccardo Mancini
2021-10-08 14:38 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/37] perf evlist: replace evsel__cpu_iter* functions with evsel__find_cpu() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-12-11 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/37] perf evlist: replace evsel__cpu_iter* functions with evsel__find_cpu Ian Rogers
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/37] perf util: add mmap_cpu_mask__duplicate function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/37] perf util/mmap: add missing bitops.h header Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/37] perf workqueue: add affinities to threadpool Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/37] perf workqueue: add support for setting affinities to workers Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/37] perf workqueue: add method to execute work on specific CPU Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/37] perf python: add workqueue dependency Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/37] perf evlist: add multithreading helper Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/37] perf evlist: add multithreading to evlist__disable Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/37] perf evlist: add multithreading to evlist__enable Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/37] perf evlist: add multithreading to evlist__close Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/37] perf evsel: remove retry_sample_id goto label Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/37] perf evsel: separate open preparation from open itself Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/37] perf evsel: save open flags in evsel Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/37] perf evsel: separate missing feature disabling from evsel__open_cpu Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/37] perf evsel: add evsel__prepare_open function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/37] perf evsel: separate missing feature detection from evsel__open_cpu Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/37] perf evsel: separate rlimit increase " Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/37] perf evsel: move ignore_missing_thread to fallback code Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/37] perf evsel: move test_attr__open to success path in evsel__open_cpu Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/37] perf evsel: move bpf_counter__install_pe " Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/37] perf evsel: handle precise_ip fallback " Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/37] perf evsel: move event open in evsel__open_cpu to separate function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 19:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-09-03 21:52 ` Riccardo Mancini [this message]
2021-09-11 19:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/37] perf evsel: add evsel__open_per_cpu_no_fallback function Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/37] perf evlist: add evlist__for_each_entry_from macro Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 20:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/37] perf evlist: add multithreading to evlist__open Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 29/37] perf evlist: add custom fallback " Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 30/37] perf record: use evlist__open_custom Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 31/37] tools lib/subcmd: add OPT_UINTEGER_OPTARG option type Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-31 18:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 32/37] perf record: add --threads option Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 33/37] perf record: pin threads to monitored cpus if enough threads available Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 34/37] perf record: apply multithreading in init and fini phases Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 35/37] perf test/evlist-open-close: add multithreading Riccardo Mancini
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 36/37] perf test/evlist-open-close: use inline func to convert timeval to usec Riccardo Mancini
2021-10-08 14:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-08-21 9:19 ` [RFC PATCH v1 37/37] perf test/evlist-open-close: add detailed output mode Riccardo Mancini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9506b14fe2965e4145c034715eb10e02f2137f7b.camel@gmail.com \
--to=rickyman7@gmail.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).