linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@intel.com>
To: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"nhorman@redhat.com" <nhorman@redhat.com>,
	"npmccallum@redhat.com" <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
	"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@intel.com>,
	"Katz-zamir, Shay" <shay.katz-zamir@intel.com>,
	"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@intel.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dr . Greg Wettstein" <greg@enjellic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v19,RESEND 24/27] x86/vdso: Add __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to wrap SGX enclave transitions
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:10:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <960B34DE67B9E140824F1DCDEC400C0F4E85C567@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7da5f00-f266-48a7-2149-49d7c8ba44a5@fortanix.com>

> > By requiring preservation of RSP at both AEX and EEXIT, this precludes
> the possibility of using the untrusted stack as temporary storage by
> enclaves. While that looks reasonable at first glance, I'm afraid it
> isn't the case in reality. The untrusted stack is inarguably the most
> convenient way for data exchange between an enclave and its enclosing
> process, and is in fact being used for that purpose by almost all
> existing enclaves to date. Given the expectation that this API will be
> used by all future SGX application, it looks unwise to ban the most
> convenient and commonly used approach for data exchange.
> 
> For reference, here's the code in the Intel toolchain responsible for
> this:
> https://github.com/intel/linux-
> sgx/blob/6a0b5ac71f8d16f04e0376f3b2168e80c773dd23/sdk/trts/trts.cpp#L125
> -L140
> 
> Regarding "almost all existing enclaves to date", enclaves built with
> the Fortanix toolchain don't touch the untrusted stack.
> 
> --
> Jethro Beekman | Fortanix

Thanks for providing the references. Yes, not every enclave touches the untrusted stack so I used the word "almost".

Everything exists for a reason. By bringing up what is done today, I was trying to inspire thinking on the more important question of "why is it done this way today?".

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-20 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-20 16:20 [PATCH v19,RESEND 00/27] Intel SGX1 support Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 01/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 19:41   ` Neil Horman
2019-03-21 14:16     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 02/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX sub-features (as Linux-defined bits) Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 03/27] x86/msr: Add IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.SGX_ENABLE definition Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 04/27] x86/cpufeatures: Add Intel-defined SGX_LC feature bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 05/27] x86/msr: Add SGX Launch Control MSR definitions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 06/27] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Add new 'PF_SGX' page fault error code bit Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:20 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 07/27] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV for userspace #PFs w/ PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 08/27] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX support and update caps appropriately Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-26 12:17   ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-26 14:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-26 21:25       ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-26 21:57         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-26 23:19           ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 09/27] x86/sgx: Add ENCLS architectural error codes Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 10/27] x86/sgx: Add SGX1 and SGX2 architectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 11/27] x86/sgx: Add definitions for SGX's CPUID leaf and variable sub-leafs Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 12/27] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 13/27] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 14/27] x86/sgx: Add functions to allocate and free EPC pages Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 15/27] x86/sgx: Add sgx_einit() for initializing enclaves Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 16/27] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-26 12:01   ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-26 12:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 14:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-26 21:11         ` Huang, Kai
2019-03-27  5:02     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 17/27] x86/sgx: Add provisioning Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 18/27] x86/sgx: Add swapping code to the core and SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 19/27] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 20/27] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 21/27] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 22/27] x86/fault: Attempt to fixup unhandled #PF in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 23/27] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 24/27] x86/vdso: Add __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to wrap SGX enclave transitions Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 18:30   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-20 18:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-20 19:57       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-20 21:03         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21  0:17           ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-22 21:20             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-21 17:17         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-22 20:31           ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-20 19:02     ` Jethro Beekman
2019-03-20 20:10       ` Xing, Cedric [this message]
2019-03-20 19:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-20 20:38       ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-22 21:59         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-23 17:36           ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-23 21:38             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-24  8:59               ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-25 18:03                 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-25 23:59                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-26  4:53                     ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-26 17:08                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-28  4:23                         ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-28 19:18                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-28 23:19                             ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-29  9:48                               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-31  8:43                                 ` Dr. Greg
2019-04-03 23:03                             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-25 23:54                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-26  4:16                   ` Xing, Cedric
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 25/27] x86/sgx: SGX documentation Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 26/27] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-20 16:21 ` [PATCH v19,RESEND 27/27] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=960B34DE67B9E140824F1DCDEC400C0F4E85C567@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=cedric.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=greg@enjellic.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=haitao.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=serge.ayoun@intel.com \
    --cc=shay.katz-zamir@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).