linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fred Klassen <fklassen@appneta.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: audit error queue
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 09:57:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9811659B-6D5A-4C4F-9CF8-735E9CA6DE4E@appneta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-Le0XKCfyDBvHmBRVqkwn1D6ZoG=12gss5T62VcN5+1_w@mail.gmail.com>



> On May 28, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> 

I will push up latest patches soon.

I did some testing and discovered that only TCP audit tests failed. They
failed much less often when enabling poll.  Once in about 20 runs
still failed. Therefore I commented out the TCP audit tests.

As for the other tests, this is what I got with poll() disabled…

udp gso zerocopy timestamp audit
udp rx:   1611 MB/s  1148129 calls/s
udp tx:   1659 MB/s    28146 calls/s  28146 msg/s
udp rx:   1686 MB/s  1201494 calls/s
udp tx:   1685 MB/s    28579 calls/s  28579 msg/s
udp rx:   1685 MB/s  1200402 calls/s
udp tx:   1683 MB/s    28552 calls/s  28552 msg/s
Summary over 3.000 seconds...
sum udp tx:   1716 MB/s      85277 calls (28425/s)      85277 msgs (28425/s)
Tx Timestamps:               85277 received                 0 errors
Zerocopy acks:               85277 received                 0 errors

Here you see that with poll() enabled, it is a bit slower, so I don’t have it
enabled in udpgso_bench.sh …

udp gso zerocopy timestamp audit
udp rx:   1591 MB/s  1133945 calls/s
udp tx:   1613 MB/s    27358 calls/s  27358 msg/s
udp rx:   1644 MB/s  1171674 calls/s
udp tx:   1643 MB/s    27869 calls/s  27869 msg/s
udp rx:   1643 MB/s  1170666 calls/s
udp tx:   1641 MB/s    27845 calls/s  27845 msg/s
Summary over 3.000 seconds...
sum udp tx:   1671 MB/s      83072 calls (27690/s)      83072 msgs (27690/s)
Tx Timestamps:               83072 received                 0 errors
Zerocopy acks:               83072 received                 0 errors


You may be interested that I reduced test lengths from 4 to 3 seconds,
but I am still getting 3 reports per test. I picked up the extra report by
changing 'if (tnow > treport)’ to 'if (tnow >= treport)’

> The only issue specific to GSO is that xmit_more can forego this
> doorbell until the last segment. We want to complicate this logic with
> a special case based on tx_flags. A process that cares should either
> not use GSO, or the timestamp should be associated with the last
> segment as I've been arguing so far.

This is the area I was thinking of looking into. I’m not sure it will work
or that it will be too messy. It may be worth a little bit of digging to
see if there is anything there. That will be down the road a bu

>> 
>> I’ll get back to you when I have tested this more thoroughly. Early results
>> suggest that adding the -P poll() option has fixed it without any appreciable
>> performance hit. I’ll share raw results with you, and we can make a final
>> decision together.
> 
> In the main loop? It still is peculiar that notifications appear to go
> missing unless the process blocks waiting for them. Nothing in
> sock_zerocopy_callback or the queueing onto the error queue should
> cause drops, as far as I know.
> 

Now that I know the issue is only in TCP, I can speculate that all bytes are
being reported, but done with fewer messages. It may warrant some
investigation in case there is some kind of bug.

> Indeed. Ideally even run all tests, but return error if any failed,
> like this recent patch
> 
>  selftests/bpf: fail test_tunnel.sh if subtests fail
>  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1105221/
> 
> but that may be a lot of code churn and better left to a separate patch.

I like it. I have it coded up, and it seems to work well. I’ll make a
separate commit in the patch set so we can yank it out if you feel
it is too much

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 21:06 [PATCH net 0/4] Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: " Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:39   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24  1:38     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24  4:53       ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 16:34         ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24 19:29           ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24 22:01             ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-25 15:20               ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 18:47                 ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-27  1:30                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27  2:09                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 20:46     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:59   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-25 20:09     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-25 20:47     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 2/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: options to exercise TX CMSG Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:45   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-23 21:52   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24  2:10     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 3/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: fix sendmmsg on unconnected socket Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:06 ` [PATCH net 4/4] net/udpgso_bench_tx: audit error queue Fred Klassen
2019-05-23 21:56   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-24  1:27     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-24  5:02       ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27 21:30     ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-27 21:46       ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-27 22:56         ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-28  1:15           ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28  5:19             ` Fred Klassen
2019-05-28 15:08               ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28 16:57                 ` Fred Klassen [this message]
2019-05-28 17:07                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-05-28 17:11                     ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9811659B-6D5A-4C4F-9CF8-735E9CA6DE4E@appneta.com \
    --to=fklassen@appneta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).