linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload length calculation
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:44:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <995b40af-13b9-faef-fb3b-235f04289eb5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929133917.9224-4-leo.yan@linaro.org>

On 29/09/2020 14:39, Leo Yan wrote:

Hi Leo,

> Defines macro for payload length calculation instead of static function.

What is the reason for that? I thought the kernel's direction is more
the other way: replacing macros with static functions ("Don't write CPP,
write C")? Ideally the compiler would generate the same code.

> Currently the event packet's 'index' is assigned as payload length, but
> the flow is not directive: it firstly gets the packet length (includes
> header length and payload length) and then reduces header length from
> packet length, so finally get the payload length; to simplify the code,
> this patch directly assigns payload length to event packet's index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c     | 26 ++++++++-----------
>  .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h     |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> index 7c7b5eb09fba..5a8696031e16 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> @@ -69,22 +69,20 @@ const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type type)
>  	return arm_spe_packet_name[type];
>  }
>  
> -/* return ARM SPE payload size from its encoding,
> - * which is in bits 5:4 of the byte.
> - * 00 : byte
> - * 01 : halfword (2)
> - * 10 : word (4)
> - * 11 : doubleword (8)
> +/*
> + * Return ARM SPE payload size from header bits 5:4
> + *   00 : byte
> + *   01 : halfword (2)
> + *   10 : word (4)
> + *   11 : doubleword (8)
>   */
> -static int payloadlen(unsigned char byte)
> -{
> -	return 1 << ((byte & 0x30) >> 4);
> -}
> +#define PAYLOAD_LEN(val)	\
> +	(1 << (((val) & SPE_HEADER_SZ_MASK) >> SPE_HEADER_SZ_SHIFT))

This change of the expression is good (although it should be 1U), but
please keep it a function. The return type should be unsigned, I guess.

The rest looks fine.

Cheers,
Andre

>  
>  static int arm_spe_get_payload(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>  			       struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
>  {
> -	size_t payload_len = payloadlen(buf[0]);
> +	size_t payload_len = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
>  
>  	if (len < 1 + payload_len)
>  		return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
> @@ -136,8 +134,6 @@ static int arm_spe_get_timestamp(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>  static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>  			      struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
>  {
> -	int ret = arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> -
>  	packet->type = ARM_SPE_EVENTS;
>  
>  	/* we use index to identify Events with a less number of
> @@ -145,9 +141,9 @@ static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>  	 * LLC-REFILL, and REMOTE-ACCESS events are identified if
>  	 * index > 1.
>  	 */
> -	packet->index = ret - 1;
> +	packet->index = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_spe_get_data_source(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> index 4c870521b8eb..f2d0af39a58c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  
>  #include <stddef.h>
>  #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>  
>  #define ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX		256
>  
> @@ -36,6 +37,9 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
>  	uint64_t		payload;
>  };
>  
> +#define SPE_HEADER_SZ_SHIFT		(4)
> +#define SPE_HEADER_SZ_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
> +
>  #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_INS		(0x0)
>  #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_BRANCH		(0x1)
>  #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_DATA_VIRT	(0x2)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 13:39 [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44   ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44   ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload length calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44   ` André Przywara [this message]
2020-10-12  0:21     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:45   ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:46   ` André Przywara
2020-10-12  0:29     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-08 19:49   ` André Przywara
2020-10-12  1:00     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-19  9:01   ` André Przywara
2020-10-19 10:41     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor context " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53   ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53   ` André Przywara
2020-10-21  3:52     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54   ` André Przywara
2020-10-21  4:54     ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21  9:20       ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:13         ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54   ` André Przywara
2020-10-21  5:16     ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54   ` André Przywara
2020-10-21  5:10     ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21  9:26       ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:17         ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 14:53           ` André Przywara
2020-10-22  0:44             ` Leo Yan
2020-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-10-13 15:19   ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=995b40af-13b9-faef-fb3b-235f04289eb5@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).