From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out of lock
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:25:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ba2952d-9399-2e0f-7beb-7e79b91bbb61@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41fe6a9670335721b48e8f5195038c3d67a3bf92.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
12.08.2020 04:31, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> Move another allocation out of regulator_list_mutex-protected region, as
> reclaim might want to take the same lock.
Is it possible to simply use the GFP_NOWAIT flag in all patches where
there is no real need to reshuffle the code? And then add a small
clarifying comment to the code about why GFP_NOWAIT is used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-18 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-12 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] regulator: fix deadlock vs memory reclaim Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-18 0:25 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() outside " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 6:29 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2020-08-12 14:09 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-08-13 8:29 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() out of lock Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free() Michał Mirosław
2020-08-12 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling() Michał Mirosław
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ba2952d-9399-2e0f-7beb-7e79b91bbb61@gmail.com \
--to=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).