From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>,
Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] scsi: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 06:53:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c03e8e2-1fda-dd9e-2716-e45175111509@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181003053902.6910-10-ldr709@gmail.com>
On 10/2/18 10:38 PM, Lance Roy wrote:
> lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
> since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
> also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-03 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-03 5:38 Using lockdep instead of spin_is_locked() Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 01/16] x86/PCI: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep Lance Roy
2018-10-03 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-04 6:50 ` Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 02/16] hv_balloon: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 13:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 03/16] sgi-xp: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 04/16] i40e: " Lance Roy
2018-10-04 18:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bowers, AndrewX
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 05/16] igbvf: " Lance Roy
2018-10-13 0:11 ` Brown, Aaron F
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 06/16] sfc: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 07/16] smsc: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 08/16] wireless: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 9:06 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-04 6:57 ` Lance Roy
2018-10-04 10:05 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-05 8:35 ` [PATCH 08/16] zd1211rw: " Kalle Valo
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 09/16] scsi: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 13:53 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-10-11 2:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 10/16] userfaultfd: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 11/16] futex: " Lance Roy
2018-10-09 11:21 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 12/16] locking/mutex: " Lance Roy
2018-10-09 12:18 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-09 13:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-10-03 5:38 ` [PATCH 13/16] mm: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 7:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-03 5:39 ` [PATCH 14/16] netfilter: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 8:29 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2018-10-03 5:39 ` [PATCH 15/16] apparmor: " Lance Roy
2018-10-03 5:56 ` John Johansen
2018-10-03 5:39 ` [PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: " Lance Roy
2018-11-02 18:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-02 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c03e8e2-1fda-dd9e-2716-e45175111509@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kartilak@cisco.com \
--cc=ldr709@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sebaddel@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).