linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] swiotlb: add support for non-coherent DMA
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 18:11:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ea28547-dd1a-b4bd-2e91-f71e70417e7d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008080246.20543-10-hch@lst.de>

On 08/10/2018 09:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Handle architectures that are not cache coherent directly in the main
> swiotlb code by calling arch_sync_dma_for_{device,cpu} in all the right
> places from the various dma_map/unmap/sync methods when the device is
> non-coherent.
> 
> Because swiotlb now uses dma_direct_alloc for the coherent allocation
> that side is already taken care of by the dma-direct code calling into
> arch_dma_{alloc,free} for devices that are non-coherent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 475a41eff3dc..52885b274368 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>   
>   #include <linux/cache.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-noncoherent.h>
>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>   #include <linux/export.h>
>   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> @@ -677,6 +678,10 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   		dma_addr = swiotlb_bounce_page(dev, &phys, size, dir, attrs);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev) &&
> +	    (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)

Nit: other parts of the file are already using the "!(...)" style rather 
than "(...) == 0".

> +		arch_sync_dma_for_device(dev, phys, size, dir);
> +
>   	return dma_addr;
>   }
>   
> @@ -696,6 +701,10 @@ void swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   
>   	BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
>   
> +	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev) &&
> +	    (attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) == 0)
> +		arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
> +
>   	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr)) {
>   		swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, attrs);
>   		return;
> @@ -732,15 +741,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   
>   	BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
>   
> -	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr)) {
> +	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev) && target == SYNC_FOR_CPU)
> +		arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
> +
> +	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr))
>   		swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, target);
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
> -	if (dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> -		return;
> +	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev) && target == SYNC_FOR_DEVICE)
> +		arch_sync_dma_for_device(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
>   
> -	dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(paddr), size);
> +	if (!is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr) && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> +		dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(paddr), size);
>   }

All these "if"s end up pretty hard to follow at first glance :(

I had a quick play at moving the cache maintenance here out into the 
callers, which comes out arguably looking perhaps a little cleaner (only 
+1 source line overall, and actually reduces text size by 32 bytes for 
my build), but sadly I can't really see any way of doing the equivalent 
for map/unmap short of duplicating the whole 3-line arch_sync_*() block, 
which just makes for a different readability problem. As you mentioned 
on patch #7, I guess this really is just one of those things which has 
no nice solution, so cosmetics aside,

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

FWIW, below is my "cleanup" attempt (diff on top of the 
swiotlb-noncoherent.3 branch).

Robin.

----->8-----
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 52885b274368..43ee29969fdd 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -741,23 +741,24 @@ swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, 
dma_addr_t dev_addr,

  	BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);

-	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev) && target == SYNC_FOR_CPU)
-		arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
-
-	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr))
+	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr)) {
  		swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, target);
+		return;
+	}

-	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev) && target == SYNC_FOR_DEVICE)
-		arch_sync_dma_for_device(hwdev, paddr, size, dir);
+	if (dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
+		return;

-	if (!is_swiotlb_buffer(paddr) && dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
-		dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(paddr), size);
+	dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(paddr), size);
  }

  void
  swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
  			    size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
  {
+	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev))
+		arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(hwdev, dma_to_phys(hwdev, dev_addr),
+				      size, dir);
  	swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
  }

@@ -766,6 +767,9 @@ swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, 
dma_addr_t dev_addr,
  			       size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
  {
  	swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+	if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(hwdev))
+		arch_sync_dma_for_device(hwdev, dma_to_phys(hwdev, dev_addr),
+					 size, dir);
  }

  /*
@@ -828,31 +832,28 @@ swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *hwdev, 
struct scatterlist *sgl,
   * The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, 
same rules
   * and usage.
   */
-static void
-swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
-		int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
-		enum dma_sync_target target)
+void
+swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
+			int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
  {
  	struct scatterlist *sg;
  	int i;

  	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
-		swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, sg->dma_address,
-				    sg_dma_len(sg), dir, target);
+		swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, sg->dma_address,
+					    sg_dma_len(sg), dir);
  }

  void
-swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
-			int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
-{
-	swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
-}
-
-void
-swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
  			   int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
  {
-	swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
+	int i;
+
+	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
+		swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(hwdev, sg->dma_address,
+					       sg_dma_len(sg), dir);
  }

  /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-22 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-08  8:02 move swiotlb noncoherent dma support from arm64 to generic code V2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] swiotlb: remove a pointless comment Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:49   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] swiotlb: mark is_swiotlb_buffer static Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:54   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:12   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] swiotlb: do not panic on mapping failures Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:06   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:18     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19  0:17   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19  6:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] swiotlb: remove the overflow buffer Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:19   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 17:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19  0:23   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] swiotlb: merge swiotlb_unmap_page and unmap_single Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:44   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:25   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] swiotlb: use swiotlb_map_page in swiotlb_map_sg_attrs Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:53   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:33   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-11-07  1:27   ` John Stultz
2018-11-09  7:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-09 16:37       ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-19 19:36         ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-20  9:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-13  0:07       ` John Stultz
2018-11-13  0:26         ` John Stultz
2018-11-14 14:13         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 23:22             ` John Stultz
2018-11-20  9:25               ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-23 18:27                 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23 19:34                   ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-26 19:31                     ` Will Deacon
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_map_page Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 18:09   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19  0:37     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19  6:52       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:46         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] swiotlb: don't dip into swiotlb pool for coherent allocations Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 17:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19  0:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 16:45   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] swiotlb: add support for non-coherent DMA Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19  0:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-22 17:11   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-10-26  8:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26  9:59       ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: use the generic swiotlb_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 13:01   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 14:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 17:05       ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-22 17:52   ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-26 12:44     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ea28547-dd1a-b4bd-2e91-f71e70417e7d@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).