linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"keith.busch@intel.com" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: RE: NVMe Poll CQ on timeout
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:58:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLUPR0201MB15052CE08EF4230487E8DEC8A5930@BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507160211.GE20686@localhost.localdomain>

> I recall we did observe issues like this when legacy interrupts were used, so
> the driver does try to use MSI/MSIx if possible.
> 
> The nvme_timeout() is called from the block layer when the driver didn't
> provide a completion within the timeout (default is 30 seconds for IO,
> 60 seconds for admin).
> 
> This message you're seeing means the device did indeed post a completion
> queue entry for the timed out command, but the driver believes it was never
> notified via interrupt to check the completion queue.
> 
> This means either one of two things happened: the interrupt was raised prior
> to the completion queue entry being written, or the interrupt was never
> raised in the first place.
> 
> It might be possible to determine which if you can read the values from
> /proc/irq/<irq#>/spurious and see if the "last_unhandled" aligns with the
> expected completion time.
> 
Thanks keith. We are seeing the condition for transactions greater than 256 KB.
We did try increase IO timeout to 60sec but we still see issue. 

We do see spurious interrupts as following:
count 53224
unhandled 15890
last_unhandled 4294917520 ms

If there are spurious interrupts, isn't the EP handler called more times 
and this might help EP driver to process pending completions. (Because as per the code in 4.14 EP
driver isn't checking any interrupt status register, it starts processing completion queues immediately
in interrupt handler)

If we have spurious why do we still see completion polled ?

Regards,
Bharat


> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are testing NVMe cards on ARM64 platform, the card uses legacy
> > > interrupts.
> > > Intermittently we are hitting following case in drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> > >        /*
> > >          * Did we miss an interrupt?
> > >          */
> > >         if (__nvme_poll(nvmeq, req->tag)) {
> > >                 dev_warn(dev->ctrl.device,
> > >                          "I/O %d QID %d timeout, completion polled\n",
> > >                          req->tag, nvmeq->qid);
> > >                 return BLK_EH_HANDLED;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > Can anyone tell when does nvme_timeout gets invoked ?
> > > What does "Did we miss an interrupt mean" ? Does it mean host
> > > missing to service a interrupt raised by EP card ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bharat

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-26 14:59 NVMe Poll CQ on timeout Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-05-07  6:57 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2018-05-07 16:02   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-15 13:58     ` Bharat Kumar Gogada [this message]
2019-09-19 13:47 Bharat Kumar Gogada
2019-09-19 14:13 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BLUPR0201MB15052CE08EF4230487E8DEC8A5930@BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=bharatku@xilinx.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).