From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754566AbbAEVq1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:46:27 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:44333 "EHLO mail-we0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751510AbbAEVq0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:46:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20141124205441.GW5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141124213501.GX5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141124223407.GB8512@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141124225754.GY5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141124233101.GA2819@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141124235058.GZ5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141125185803.GC3938@pd.tnic> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:46:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context From: Tony Luck To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov , Paul McKenney , X86 ML , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Andi Kleen , Josh Triplett , =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYyBXZWlzYmVja2Vy?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I think you need ist_begin_non_atomic() before local_irq_enable() and > ist_end_non_atomic() after local_irq_disable(). Otherwise it should > be good. In your x86/paranoid branch you added: prev_state = ist_enter(regs); .... body of do_machine_check() here ... ist_exit(regs, prev_state); Does that override the previous advice? Or do I still need something before I call local_irq_enable() and after local_irq_disable()? -Tony