linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND 2] Take over futex of dead task only if FUTEX_WAITERS is not set
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:18:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAHN_R0jTey+4TOXfKh96aApOPUXQq6wwobejmhFeRuTV2VJKA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1210232138540.2756@ionos>

> Now there is a different solution to that problem. Do not look at the
> user space value at all and enforce a lookup of possibly available
> pi_state. If pi_state can be found, then the new incoming locker T3
> blocks on that pi_state and legitimately races with T2 to acquire the
> rt_mutex and the pi_state and therefor the proper ownership of the
> user space futex.

That works. Thanks for the detailed explanation too.


-- 
http://siddhesh.in

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-11 14:52 [PATCH] Take over futex of dead task only if FUTEX_WAITERS is not set Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-17  7:15 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-22  3:20   ` [PATCH] [RESEND 2] " Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-23 14:04     ` Darren Hart
2012-10-23 20:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-24 12:48         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2012-10-24 18:08           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-25  4:36             ` Darren Hart
2012-10-25  4:44               ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-25  4:33         ` Darren Hart
2012-10-25  8:14           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-10-25  8:18             ` Darren Hart
2012-11-01 21:35         ` [tip:core/urgent] futex: Handle futex_pi OWNER_DIED take over correctly tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAHN_R0jTey+4TOXfKh96aApOPUXQq6wwobejmhFeRuTV2VJKA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).