From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+7fa38a608b1075dfd634@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
mans@mansr.com, syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Re: general protection fault in usb_set_interface
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:59:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+yz3dtfx0Jfd4sbOcN8tSxp8+qAvW609sP_yJC5q6vq8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1912131448080.1332-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:51 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>
> > > > Let's retry here:
> > >
> > > > #syz test: https://github.com/google/kasan.git f0df5c1b
> > >
> > > This bug is already marked as fixed. No point in testing.
> > >
> >
> > Hm, that explains some of the weirdness. It doesn't explain though
> > neither why the patch was actually tested when Alan requested it nor
> > why syzbot sent no reply.
>
> In the meantime, is there any way to get syzbot to test the new patch
> with the old reproducer? Perhaps tell it to re-open this bug?
No, we can only test this manually now. I can run the reproducer for
you. Should I revert the fix for this bug and then apply your patch?
What's the expected result?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-16 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 13:29 general protection fault in usb_set_interface syzbot
2019-09-16 20:51 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-16 21:03 ` syzbot
2019-09-17 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-17 15:28 ` syzbot
2019-09-17 15:53 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-17 16:06 ` syzbot
2019-09-17 17:36 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-17 18:08 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-17 18:15 ` syzbot
2019-09-17 18:31 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-17 18:43 ` syzbot
2019-09-18 18:57 ` Alan Stern
2019-09-19 15:19 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-12-13 12:15 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-12-13 12:16 ` syzbot
2019-12-13 12:19 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-12-13 19:51 ` Alan Stern
2019-12-16 14:59 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2019-12-16 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2019-12-16 15:24 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-12-17 13:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAeHK+yz3dtfx0Jfd4sbOcN8tSxp8+qAvW609sP_yJC5q6vq8A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=syzbot+7fa38a608b1075dfd634@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).