linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kyle Huey <khuey@pernos.co>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64: Register modification during syscall entry/exit stop
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 12:20:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABV8kRwhsPhhqUXS46Rwh-xDEDY2q=KSd-xz1W-pu4Gy4KVp8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527101929.GT5031@arm.com>

> Can't PTRACE_SYSEMU be emulated by using PTRACE_SYSCALL, cancelling the
> syscall at the syscall enter stop, then modifying the regs at the
> syscall exit stop?

Yes, it can. The idea behind SYSEMU is to be able to save half the
ptrace traps that would require, in theory making the ptracer
a decent amount faster. That said, the x7 issue is orthogonal to
SYSEMU, you'd have the same issues if you used PTRACE_SYSCALL.


Keno

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-31 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19  1:05 arm64: Register modification during syscall entry/exit stop Keno Fischer
2020-05-19  8:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-19  8:37   ` Keno Fischer
2020-05-20 17:41     ` Will Deacon
2020-05-23  5:35       ` Keno Fischer
2020-05-24  6:56         ` Keno Fischer
2020-05-27  9:55           ` Will Deacon
2020-05-27 10:19             ` Dave Martin
2020-05-31  9:33               ` Will Deacon
2020-05-31 16:13                 ` Keno Fischer
2020-06-01  9:14                   ` Dave Martin
2020-06-01  9:23                     ` Keno Fischer
2020-06-01  9:52                       ` Dave Martin
2020-05-31 16:20               ` Keno Fischer [this message]
2020-06-01  9:23                 ` Dave Martin
2020-06-01  9:40                   ` Keno Fischer
2020-06-01  9:59                     ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABV8kRwhsPhhqUXS46Rwh-xDEDY2q=KSd-xz1W-pu4Gy4KVp8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keno@juliacomputing.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=khuey@pernos.co \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).