From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCD4C432BE for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8B560FE6 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231167AbhHKMcB (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:32:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230281AbhHKMb5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:31:57 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60DAC061386 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id h11so4219533ljo.12 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D5OlZ8oq6iOCdn4aMeG+EEph9Sb1Lla5I4LvuXvSK8A=; b=yxqhdCu/Qo68ddda8afkVdUuov6gTdX9x074yF+7r4kxHkkK2vFbEbiXB2Kl42komk uz5NPqfrnDYX3RbRLlnmXZODJDggmdPFMxMDSLwoD2l/HwkgDbE1gvy7STJCz+e65YtN z5xesgxo3uN8jH9rYn0Sob+2LRCkPlEIYS237Vz7rm8UqyQsV9NsHYVvmJqG1bjPQAMX zRStxZCtg5aGpGjtPDcYzmvw1ubJIwRv/tIDlskxY8flufvRcPbFDuYaVf3Con+7JPUe rOYO6dE9dJyA56ZEgtW0ecC8NkUjs+NlntX1f9Y4W60bbXOss6v4DpUWQ7CLJZgNXKct bixA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D5OlZ8oq6iOCdn4aMeG+EEph9Sb1Lla5I4LvuXvSK8A=; b=Ztlxr3apu8nP2CdsX5bYhUQFYCErpRlRFMpztWqYrXaSGfkrK4YM48QOu79HCtocxK sJTV1mCQ5+9CGbQAyYB7+IexexP4dz2jjQbxlsa+dAr1nxsKgYxlco2SLarcZmNIgmO2 +wiiqY2eZOvZeIi/rsHkCUXwwkNJLHOrrkbdL5nnD/RDzYjqFQsOsr/XVhneUps6ePOl nfpmVo0wixUzIZlHntJQlC6Mu3jIChYVhfA4U2sHKfr/XLTvNofNq5R5bmVIERU4Voq5 9uY9Hk57RSuqWMzjUinh7h9TILepV0eXZITSGqKycrwyh5Mx2XMUt2+UkUrFkFQYJ5A4 BtuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/KJbKLKp+JRMf1CHwmkS/yPhc07O6x+WFGxqZOBaAtL4ck6sE xSDTutORCBjbOHd5fs1ioW1qifrKzkJW4RuT1R3rsw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwR2jWpMR0T0owMZaLYzWcyHOEHETHN6xD7KLu7UfEpJk7ksIDK0sBzw2b6PX7p1HpG0zZox0yZRkt4VIF0sKA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a231:: with SMTP id i17mr12603890ljm.467.1628684898091; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:28:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <96223fb8143a4eaa9b183d376ff46e5cd8ef54b4.1628590591.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <96223fb8143a4eaa9b183d376ff46e5cd8ef54b4.1628590591.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:28:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] gpio: virtio: Add IRQ support To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Bartosz Golaszewski , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , Viresh Kumar , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Vincent Guittot , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Bill Mills , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= , Cornelia Huck , Geert Uytterhoeven , stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel , Thomas Gleixner , Marc Zyngier , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:25 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > This patch adds IRQ support for the virtio GPIO driver. Note that this > uses the irq_bus_lock/unlock() callbacks, since those operations over > virtio may sleep. Also the notifications for the eventq are processed > using a work item to allow sleep-able operations. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Looks good to me from a GPIO point of view: Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij