From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78133C4CEC4 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493ED21897 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cvAyWueZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731504AbfIRUbe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:31:34 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f67.google.com ([209.85.217.67]:36429 "EHLO mail-vs1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726310AbfIRUbd (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:31:33 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f67.google.com with SMTP id v19so753388vsv.3; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k00cJxJVOrZHQZWIDnw9OPdlixcLBPMnLm2wjYYctZQ=; b=cvAyWueZzWSZSju5V7PXoSzoAOQ2+3Fdjnf3enoHLDk42j68+thtOVj7z2AEWxKfC7 ++GH+cn+GG2nsZUmIgCdzBC+azyFg53Bh3O0I0VFVEd1fVpsZVm1otzzw86XCAUz4K1r rh8q6GjnZjAfKoLZLXV4Tup4A2JmM8gU0BBVxoWEATzoEC6JuFAHVJ2guHEk6+rfhNsu PqSbSYATke0WCSM4parfRcIGWQzb+UVD1xmE8nU9LPmzVo6IHpypSnW8FYZMOkc+Z1cZ L9uM9BrVzMhLC0Q/0W9tZtIzw+3i8mV7o2ZBnmM1fYY+tc91K2pZsxFEXqTU5ouYMWj9 2IKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k00cJxJVOrZHQZWIDnw9OPdlixcLBPMnLm2wjYYctZQ=; b=Ekf7xOfdY7QhjZEexhi5brwBM/v5qFrNc8WJL8hiET+BlTGiFqp8vEIc6JbVh9WrEp uqKxmvkrCTmkewCxkaf8pEAg/5HfFsCI15IncGRzFZzFLQczxOHad8s9LH3XYKqqKPWi yrdNbi1reioxF8jhmySaEWjEF1e5lz6BkLMM4XNqCTWcGy47sdH7lVJcen0qbb/3IXbr BVg393qO6w79BfsPG1k7q+iN6PfL+LpJ0s46sajhwRqHsd3LNwkOYqMBi6n3sDTDd1/l umAtRcWX+82LGrpVgJL7iJTB1aji7gVkHZdUSyB8oMtqqEVZgSvmv/TJzuh3cAg32fiQ 8BHw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVLAfHha3blzOWLTNeBbxEnPMKO7f4IPU/YtdBPkR58nu0jLGTc bhEzhvztlyjJrkc6NI6A7Gfj1RRPCkLc9x/YS6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0/NfTdkYtF/83p7/m4C+2xB93JAFy/AQRs14cASEOg3z6U9/VjIuYDTba7nMYHih72p7t5LuzG3fRVAKYro8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7087:: with SMTP id l129mr3517858vsc.83.1568838692756; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190828160817.6250-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20190918195920.25210-1-qkrwngud825@gmail.com> <20190918201318.GB2025570@kroah.com> <20190918202629.GA2026850@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20190918202629.GA2026850@kroah.com> From: Ju Hyung Park Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:31:21 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: rebase to sdFAT v2.2.0 To: Greg KH , Valdis Kletnieks Cc: Namjae Jeon , sj1557.seo@samsung.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linkinjeon@gmail.com, Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.levin@microsoft.com, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:26 AM Greg KH wrote: > That differs from the original exfat code, so something is odd here. I > need some sort of clarification from Samsung as to when they changed the > license in order to be able to relicense these files. We should probably ask Valdis on what happened there. Even the old exFAT v1.2.24 from Galaxy S7 is using "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". You can go check it yourself by searching "G930F" from http://opensource.samsung.com. I'm guessing he probably used "GPL-2.0" during his clean-up.