From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
lsrao@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 2/6] soc: qcom: rpmh: Update dirty flag only when data changes
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:16:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WOwMrTNS7FK0jybJyEOvT-rHarA0m5U6B+pKoeA7RCHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158708153779.132238.7823999141480422982@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:59 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-04-12 07:50:00)
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> > index eb0ded0..03630ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
> > @@ -133,26 +134,27 @@ static struct cache_req *cache_rpm_request(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr,
> >
> > req->addr = cmd->addr;
> > req->sleep_val = req->wake_val = UINT_MAX;
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list);
> > list_add_tail(&req->list, &ctrlr->cache);
> >
> > existing:
> > + old_sleep_val = req->sleep_val;
> > + old_wake_val = req->wake_val;
> > +
> > switch (state) {
> > case RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE:
> > - if (req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX)
> > - req->wake_val = cmd->data;
> > - break;
> > case RPMH_WAKE_ONLY_STATE:
> > req->wake_val = cmd->data;
> > break;
> > case RPMH_SLEEP_STATE:
> > req->sleep_val = cmd->data;
> > break;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > }
> >
> > - ctrlr->dirty = true;
> > + ctrlr->dirty = (req->sleep_val != old_sleep_val ||
> > + req->wake_val != old_wake_val) &&
> > + req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX &&
> > + req->wake_val != UINT_MAX;
>
> Can this change ctrl->dirty from true to false? I'm worried that we need
> to make this a saturating assignment instead of an assignment.
>
> ctrl->dirty = ctrl->dirty || (req->sleep_val != .. );
This seems like a serious problem with the current code and feels like
we need a fix sooner rather than later. I'm sorry I missed it in
review (and in fact, I probably suggested the exact code that's here
so it's even more my fault). :(
I posted:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417141531.1.Ia4b74158497213eabad7c3d474c50bfccb3f342e@changeid
-Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-12 14:49 [PATCH v17 0/6] Invoke rpmh_flush for non OSI targets Maulik Shah
2020-04-12 14:49 ` [PATCH v17 1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cpuidle low power states Maulik Shah
2020-04-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v17 2/6] soc: qcom: rpmh: Update dirty flag only when data changes Maulik Shah
2020-04-13 21:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-16 23:58 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-17 21:16 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2020-04-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v17 3/6] soc: qcom: rpmh: Invalidate SLEEP and WAKE TCSes before flushing new data Maulik Shah
2020-04-13 21:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v17 4/6] soc: qcom: rpmh: Invoke rpmh_flush() for dirty caches Maulik Shah
2020-04-13 16:17 ` Doug Anderson
2020-04-13 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v17 5/6] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Clear active mode configuration for wake TCS Maulik Shah
2020-04-12 14:50 ` [PATCH v17 6/6] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Allow using free WAKE TCS for active request Maulik Shah
2020-04-13 21:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-14 5:34 ` [PATCH v17 0/6] Invoke rpmh_flush for non OSI targets Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-14 9:19 ` Maulik Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD=FV=WOwMrTNS7FK0jybJyEOvT-rHarA0m5U6B+pKoeA7RCHQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsrao@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).