From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:44:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTt7VfqM=UyCnvNFxrSw8Z6cUtAi3HUwR4_xPAc03SgHjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6281446.GoJLz6Hq6C@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:23 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, July 4, 2018 4:47:07 AM CEST Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 8:50:38 AM CEST Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > > commit 52cdbdd49853 ("driver core: correct device's shutdown order")
> > > > places an assumption of supplier<-consumer order on the process of probe.
> > > > But it turns out to break down the parent <- child order in some scene.
> > > > E.g in pci, a bridge is enabled by pci core, and behind it, the devices
> > > > have been probed. Then comes the bridge's module, which enables extra
> > > > feature(such as hotplug) on this bridge.
> > >
> > > So what *exactly* does happen in that case?
> > >
> > I saw the shpc_probe() is called on the bridge, although the probing
> > failed on that bare-metal. But if it success, then it will enable the
> > hotplug feature on the bridge.
>
> I don't understand what you are saying here, sorry.
>
On the system, I observe the following:
[ 2.114986] devices_kset: Moving 0004:00:00.0 to end of list
<---pcie port drive's probe, but it failed
[ 2.115192] devices_kset: Moving 0004:01:00.0 to end of list
[ 2.115591] devices_kset: Moving 0004:02:02.0 to end of list
[ 2.115923] devices_kset: Moving 0004:02:0a.0 to end of list
[ 2.116141] devices_kset: Moving 0004:02:0b.0 to end of list
[ 2.116358] devices_kset: Moving 0004:02:0c.0 to end of list
[ 3.181860] devices_kset: Moving 0004:03:00.0 to end of list
<---the ata disk controller which sits behind the bridge
[ 10.267081] devices_kset: Moving 0004:00:00.0 to end of list
<---shpc_probe() on this bridge, failed too.
As you can the the parent device "0004:00:00.0" is moved twice, and
finally, it is after the "0004:03:00.0", this will break the
"parent<-child" order in devices_kset. This is caused by the code
really_probe()->devices_kset_move_last(). Apparently, it makes
assumption that child device's probing comes after its parent's. But
it does not stand up in the case.
> device_reorder_to_tail() walks the entire device hierarchy below the target
> and moves all of the children in there *after* their parents.
>
As described, the bug is not related with device_reorder_to_tail(), it
is related with really_probe()->devices_kset_move_last(). So [2/4]
uses different method to achieve the "parent<-child" and
"supplier<-consumer" order. The [3/4] clean up some code in
device_reorder_to_tail(), since I need to revert the commit.
> How can it break "the parent <- child order" then?
>
As described, it does not, just not be in use any longer.
Thanks and regards,
Pingfan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-05 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-03 6:50 [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 6:50 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] drivers/base: fold the routine of device's shutdown into a func Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 6:50 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] drivers/base: utilize device tree info to shutdown devices Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 7:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-07-03 9:26 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04 3:10 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 10:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-03 17:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-04 17:04 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-05 10:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 3:02 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-06 9:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-07 4:02 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-06 10:00 ` [PATCH] driver core: Drop devices_kset_move_last() call from really_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 13:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-09 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-10 6:19 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-10 10:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 6:33 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-10 11:35 ` [PATCH] driver core: Partially revert "driver core: correct device's shutdown order" Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:22 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-10 12:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 12:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-10 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-10 15:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-10 19:13 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-03 6:50 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] drivers/base: clean up the usage of devices_kset_move_last() Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 14:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 4:40 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04 10:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05 2:32 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 6:50 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] Revert "driver core: correct device's shutdown order" Pingfan Liu
2018-07-03 14:35 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-04 2:47 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-04 10:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-05 2:44 ` Pingfan Liu [this message]
2018-07-05 9:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 8:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-07-06 8:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 13:55 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-07 4:24 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-08 8:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 6:48 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-09 7:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-09 8:40 ` Pingfan Liu
2018-07-09 8:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-06 10:02 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2018-07-06 13:52 ` Pingfan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFgQCTt7VfqM=UyCnvNFxrSw8Z6cUtAi3HUwR4_xPAc03SgHjQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).