From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: Update device link status correctly for SYNC_STATE_ONLY links
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:45:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_jyE2UyP4ovT3KXhjOenRhpUPQAqDtTcgfgenW5NGQgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66f871c4c457d908ea86545c1aa871bf@walle.cc>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:13 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>
> Am 2020-05-26 21:43, schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > When SYNC_STATE_ONLY support was added in commit 05ef983e0d65 ("driver
> > core: Add device link support for SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag"),
> > SYNC_STATE_ONLY links were treated similar to STATELESS links in terms
> > of not blocking consumer probe if the supplier hasn't probed yet.
> >
> > That caused a SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link's status to not get updated.
> > Since SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link is no longer useful once the
> > consumer probes, commit 21c27f06587d ("driver core: Fix
> > SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link implementation") addresses the status
> > update issue by deleting the SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link instead of
> > complicating the status update code.
> >
> > However, there are still some cases where we need to update the status
> > of a SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link. This is because a SYNC_STATE_ONLY
> > device link can later get converted into a normal MANAGED device link
> > when a normal MANAGED device link is created between a supplier and
> > consumer that already have a SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link between them.
> >
> > If a SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link's status isn't maintained correctly
> > till it's converted to a normal MANAGED device link, then the normal
> > MANAGED device link will end up with a wrong link status. This can
> > cause
> > a warning stack trace[1] when the consumer device probes successfully.
> >
> > This commit fixes the SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link status update issue
> > where it wouldn't transition correctly from DL_STATE_DORMANT or
> > DL_STATE_AVAILABLE to DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE. It also resets the
> > status
> > back to DL_STATE_DORMANT or DL_STATE_AVAILABLE if the consumer probe
> > fails.
> >
> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200522204120.3b3c9ed6@apollo/
> > Fixes: 05ef983e0d65 ("driver core: Add device link support for
> > SYNC_STATE_ONLY flag")
> > Fixes: 21c27f06587d ("driver core: Fix SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link
> > implementation")
> > Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > - Added code to "revert" the link status if consumer probe fails
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > I think this is the issue Michael ran into. I'd like him to test the
> > fix
> > before it's pulled in.
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > If you can test this on the branch you saw the issue in and give a
> > Tested-by if it works, that'd be great.
>
> with v2 I'm triggering the
> WARN_ON(!(link->status & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY));
> in __device_links_no_driver().
Thanks for the logs! The WARNING is due to a dump typo in this line. I
should be checking link->flags, not link->status here. I'll send out a
v3, but you can test with this change too.
-Saravana
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-16 8:07 [PATCH v1] driver core: Fix memory leak when adding SYNC_STATE_ONLY device links Saravana Kannan
2020-05-18 7:48 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-18 8:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-18 19:47 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-19 3:00 ` [PATCH v2] driver core: Fix SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link implementation Saravana Kannan
2020-05-19 5:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-19 6:30 ` [PATCH v3] " Saravana Kannan
2020-05-19 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-22 18:41 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-22 22:21 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-22 22:47 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-25 11:31 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-25 18:39 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-25 19:04 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-25 21:24 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-25 21:38 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-26 7:05 ` [PATCH v1] driver core: Update device link status correctly for SYNC_STATE_ONLY links Saravana Kannan
2020-05-26 7:07 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-26 11:04 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-26 18:08 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-26 8:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-26 19:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Saravana Kannan
2020-05-26 21:13 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-26 21:45 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2020-05-26 21:53 ` Michael Walle
2020-05-26 22:00 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-26 22:09 ` [PATCH v3] " Saravana Kannan
2020-05-27 8:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-28 16:09 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGETcx_jyE2UyP4ovT3KXhjOenRhpUPQAqDtTcgfgenW5NGQgA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).