linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:01:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKQVDW8Wp0ESv2raa0xJnHCCMNqFCzZ5jSVXQ=Dp7FF8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6122c7d-bd29-d081-3c1e-96b7c369d4fe@schaufler-ca.com>

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 9/24/2018 5:18 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> v3:
>> - add CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE and refactor resulting logic
>
> Kees, you can add my
>
>         Reviewed-by:Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
>
> for this entire patch set. Thank you for taking this on, it's
> a significant and important chunk of the LSM infrastructure
> update.

Thanks!

John, you'd looked at this a bit too -- do the results line up with
your expectations?

Any thoughts from SELinux, TOMOYO, or IMA folks?

-Kees

>
>
>> ...
>> Breakdown of patches:
>>
>> Infrastructure improvements (no logical changes):
>>   LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization
>>   vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section
>>   LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info
>>   LSM: Remove initcall tracing
>>   LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info
>>   vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA
>>   LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM()
>>   LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info
>>   LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure
>>   LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures
>>
>> Split "integrity" out into "ordered initialization" (no logical changes):
>>   LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR
>>   LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization
>>
>> Provide centralized LSM enable/disable infrastructure:
>>   LoadPin: Rename "enable" to "enforce"
>>   LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state
>>   LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs
>>   LSM: Prepare for arbitrary LSM enabling
>>   LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE
>>   LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable=
>>   LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic
>>   LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disable
>>
>> Provide centralized LSM ordering infrastructure:
>>   LSM: Build ordered list of ordered LSMs for init
>>   LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER
>>   LSM: Introduce "lsm.order=" for boottime ordering
>>
>> Move minor LSMs into ordered LSM initialization:
>>   LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM
>>   Yama: Initialize as ordered LSM
>>   LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order
>>   capability: Initialize as LSM_ORDER_FIRST
>>
>> Move major LSMs into ordered LSM initialization:
>>   LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM
>>   LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  20 +
>>  arch/arc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S                 |   1 -
>>  arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S             |   1 -
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S               |   1 -
>>  arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S               |   1 -
>>  arch/microblaze/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S          |   2 -
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S             |   2 -
>>  arch/um/include/asm/common.lds.S              |   2 -
>>  arch/xtensa/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S              |   1 -
>>  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h             |  25 +-
>>  include/linux/init.h                          |   2 -
>>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h                     |  43 ++-
>>  include/linux/module.h                        |   1 -
>>  security/Kconfig                              |  61 ++-
>>  security/apparmor/lsm.c                       |  16 +-
>>  security/commoncap.c                          |   8 +-
>>  security/integrity/iint.c                     |   5 +-
>>  security/loadpin/Kconfig                      |   4 +-
>>  security/loadpin/loadpin.c                    |  28 +-
>>  security/security.c                           | 351 +++++++++++++++---
>>  security/selinux/hooks.c                      |  16 +-
>>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c                    |   8 +-
>>  security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c                      |   7 +-
>>  security/yama/yama_lsm.c                      |   7 +-
>>  24 files changed, 438 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>>
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-28 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-25  0:18 [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 01/29] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization Kees Cook
2018-10-01 19:53   ` James Morris
2018-10-01 21:05   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 02/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section Kees Cook
2018-10-01 19:56   ` James Morris
2018-10-01 21:05   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 03/29] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-01 19:57   ` James Morris
2018-10-01 21:06   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 04/29] LSM: Remove initcall tracing Kees Cook
2018-09-26 16:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-26 18:35     ` Kees Cook
2018-09-30 23:25       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-01  1:01         ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:07   ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 21:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-10-01 22:38       ` Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 05/29] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-01 19:59   ` James Morris
2018-10-01 21:08   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 06/29] vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:10   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 07/29] LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM() Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:12   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 08/29] LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:13   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 09/29] LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:14   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 10/29] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:14   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 11/29] LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:15   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 12/29] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:17   ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 22:03     ` Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 13/29] LoadPin: Rename "enable" to "enforce" Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:17   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 14/29] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:18   ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 21:47   ` James Morris
2018-10-01 21:56     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 22:20       ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 22:29         ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 22:53           ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 15/29] LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:18   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 16/29] LSM: Prepare for arbitrary LSM enabling Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:22   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 17/29] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:34   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 18/29] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:46   ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 22:27     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 22:48       ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 23:30         ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 23:38           ` Kees Cook
2018-10-01 23:57             ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 23:44           ` John Johansen
2018-10-01 23:49             ` Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 19/29] LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic Kees Cook
2018-10-01 21:47   ` John Johansen
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 20/29] LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disable Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 21/29] LSM: Build ordered list of ordered LSMs for init Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 22/29] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 23/29] LSM: Introduce "lsm.order=" for boottime ordering Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 24/29] LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 25/29] Yama: " Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 26/29] LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 27/29] capability: Initialize as LSM_ORDER_FIRST Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 28/29] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM Kees Cook
2018-09-25  0:18 ` [PATCH security-next v3 29/29] LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization Kees Cook
2018-09-28 15:55 ` [PATCH security-next v3 00/29] LSM: Explict LSM ordering Casey Schaufler
2018-09-28 20:01   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2018-09-28 20:25     ` Stephen Smalley
2018-09-28 20:33       ` Stephen Smalley
2018-09-28 20:54         ` Kees Cook
2018-09-29 10:48     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-29 18:18       ` Kees Cook
2018-09-30  2:36         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-09-30 16:57           ` Kees Cook
2018-09-29 18:19       ` John Johansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jKQVDW8Wp0ESv2raa0xJnHCCMNqFCzZ5jSVXQ=Dp7FF8A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).