Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:27 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
>
>   security/selinux/include/classmap.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   f4d653dcaa4e ("selinux: implement the security_uring_cmd() LSM hook")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   ed5d44d42c95 ("selinux: Implement userns_create hook")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> index 1c2f41ff4e55,0bff55bb9cde..000000000000
> --- a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> +++ b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> @@@ -253,7 -253,9 +253,9 @@@ const struct security_class_mapping sec
>         { "anon_inode",
>           { COMMON_FILE_PERMS, NULL } },
>         { "io_uring",
>  -        { "override_creds", "sqpoll", NULL } },
>  +        { "override_creds", "sqpoll", "cmd", NULL } },
> +       { "user_namespace",
> +         { "create", NULL } },
>         { NULL }
>     };

Thanks Stephen, that looks correct.

-- 
paul-moore.com