From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC8EC433ED for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6090611C9 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231640AbhEJWWw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:22:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233405AbhEJWWX (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:22:23 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489F5C061350 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id r5so8508328lfr.5 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F/mygZtksxxw7ebcmiKl2JaPpBSjJqhK2xo7cgVegBg=; b=bRrmxrdr1iOaibrv9cizl2QRi3u+OeaySXanNQ0pi15kpxBfvLETb8dxk2J5vayapj Olhy8OeDmqAAOOKMLpbUs7zYKIfztm7qM1SVT92jGz3qbSjc4BWcrYbyj/3t7UyyNLth zeHY7rnL917j0NoPMRLH/BEBBP8dlcY22ZKbY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F/mygZtksxxw7ebcmiKl2JaPpBSjJqhK2xo7cgVegBg=; b=tqJc5XqO02FpbweM9MzSqQgfp3Vk1vnAOUYvPbma0AG5fFoX+APMoQHRbrk+99Rgaj rSSr5K/TB0isrecU4F2mteveHXI8iTbStmBSzh3F3hfiIo6sREXhTA5Dcq33jVZgjqe1 jDD7t9dxlrUnLc8MPwmBA04BjNBxSdUTWel16i/5lKAR5tjIzN9X3Ep7yGnz7ByUkeaz 98yxQxs9sFHqgrhFITonIU3E+8hyVJXNElebVg0Xd+oRWB+6KEaIrmUho/E31ZrAiUPo f8YnDMSwYpwww9ZovoVzs3TwN4lUhd7F05PoBHQQrv/gBI3Lr2bVrbyKj/4uDJJpceKQ tOog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kXnM0OkrCURlUJhEtCoO0F+L1CqfkZQGXJyS9lxbMmGBL2g3t QrOXgOYT+yyjw5VjwvuFgwNmDyK6YhWNJj35V+Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLkKnCTcoB+aX3yg7KYdnnSCxz9R7v/PpoK0ZJ902OupkNag9a2I93zxo0Vm3FQa6IX8cVog== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b2a:: with SMTP id f42mr10465909lfv.208.1620685258420; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com. [209.85.208.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y13sm2390032lfl.252.2021.05.10.15.20.57 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id o16so22734198ljp.3 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:20:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1311:: with SMTP id u17mr21150586lja.48.1620685257343; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:20:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210510025414.GA2041281@roeck-us.net> <20210510193924.GA3929105@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <20210510193924.GA3929105@roeck-us.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:20:41 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.13-rc1 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tudor Ambarus Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Guenter Roeck , Saravana Kannan , Stephen Boyd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just adding Greg & co explicitly to the participants to make sure they're aware of this.. Greg? This came through your driver core tree. Linus On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:39 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:01:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 7:54 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > Qemu test results: > > > total: 462 pass: 460 fail: 2 > > > Failed tests: > > > arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:initrd > > > arm:raspi2:multi_v7_defconfig:sd:net,usb:bcm2836-rpi-2-b:rootfs > > > > > > The raspi2 problem (a crash in of_clk_add_hw_provider) is well known. > > > It was introduced with commit 6579c8d97ad7 ("clk: Mark fwnodes when > > > their clock provider is added"). Unfortunately it appears that there > > > is still no agreement on how to fix it. > > > > Hmm. I see > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210426065618.588144-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com/ > > > > and don't see any objections to that version. > > > > Does that fix it for you too? > > > > Yes, it does. It was submitted ~2 weeks ago, so I have no idea what its > status might be (it is not in the most recent -next). I just sent a > Tested-by:, figuring that it can't hurt. > > Guenter