From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
cluster-devel <cluster-devel@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] iov_iter: Introduce iov_iter_fault_in_writeable helper
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:51:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whemWRZRDDvHnesBbTo1hO2qkWkMtGUSfPvEOq7kAfouQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHc6FU4N7vz+jfoUSa45Mr_F0Ht0_PXroWoc5UNkMgFmpKLaNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:14 AM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:30 AM David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is it actually worth doing any more than ensuring the first byte
> > of the buffer is paged in before entering the block that has
> > to disable page faults?
>
> We definitely do want to process as many pages as we can, especially
> if allocations are involved during a write.
Yeah, from an efficiency standpoint, once you start walking page
tables, it's probably best to just handle as much as you can.
But once you get an error, I don't think it should be "everything is bad".
This is a bit annoying, because while *most* users really just want
that "everything is good", *some* users might just want to handle the
partial success case.
It's why "copy_to/from_user()" returns the number of bytes *not*
written, rather than -EFAULT like get/put_user(). 99% of all users
just want to know "did I write all bytes" (and then checking for a
zero return is a simple and cheap verification of "everything was
ok").
But then very occasionally, you hit a case where you actually want to
know how much of a copy worked. It's rare, but it happens, and the
read/write system calls tend to be the main user of it.
And yes, the fact that "copy_to/from_user()" doesn't return an error
(like get/put_user() does) has confused people many times over the
years. It's annoying, but it's required by those (few) users that
really do want to handle that partial case.
I think this iov_iter_fault_in_readable/writeable() case should do the same.
And no, it's not new to Andreas' patch. iov_iter_fault_in_readable()
is doing the "everything has to be good" thing already.
Which maybe implies that nobody cares about partial reads/writes. Or
it's very very rare - I've seen code that handles page faults in user
space, but it's admittedly been some very special CPU
simulator/emulator checkpointing stuff.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 19:34 [PATCH v4 0/8] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] iov_iter: Introduce iov_iter_fault_in_writeable helper Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-24 20:24 ` Al Viro
2021-07-24 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-24 21:38 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 21:57 ` Al Viro
2021-07-24 22:06 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 23:39 ` Al Viro
2021-07-27 9:30 ` David Laight
2021-07-27 11:13 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-27 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] gfs2: Add wrapper for iomap_file_buffered_write Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks for buffered I/O Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] iomap: Fix iomap_dio_rw return value for user copies Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] iomap: Add done_before argument to iomap_dio_rw Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] iomap: Support restarting direct I/O requests after user copy failures Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] iov_iter: Introduce noio flag to disable page faults Andreas Gruenbacher
2021-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] gfs2: Fix mmap + page fault deadlocks for direct I/O Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=whemWRZRDDvHnesBbTo1hO2qkWkMtGUSfPvEOq7kAfouQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).