From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737ABC433EF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242474AbhLMTov (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:44:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242466AbhLMTou (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:44:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6B8C06173F for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id z5so56389573edd.3 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h/bn2QA4sRokY+lW2mdsTbBERIo47tUeAt+yGqnl3lo=; b=Sh0+xasBUXbS3UacsNmltTp0MkTV/oG+CZVOKrPRjJVjfnIicuuAMfk55RUBcNdHOJ a0LPNIeZDwnZdOGVq4OgGQC4LYdsKQaraEp0aNMWame4VS7gnVm0YgzmNmP7p2NWPgb6 A2RmLpAuWMJW1dAopi867SmawQF/hfeeQk1/c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h/bn2QA4sRokY+lW2mdsTbBERIo47tUeAt+yGqnl3lo=; b=1LJ7xg7d6ZoTgnj8Apit2qNX8qdykCc0IM3afPt81ziUUCRi5iLKAIomYwiahyY79H Pn6bSCSGzUqselFlX8rN63PklGkZ7lNg1lWbuGWEGjpE0R26Rg0hGAegl5yXClNavJqb Wa1rchfnx858YYpZWFHdqCDnUiPprGsytPeMItgLnKKpVy1VfhgodNHcb9KmYwAt3tvQ sHePVPloreN2SCast0Fqrb1CNHP+TxfFXc6sq9YuANZ1k2ZaSp71z/d2pswsx/yHgUVk 5R9HZcH4qaiUq3Qe+dCBtJ0yhtnX0SGFGWsGJtA2dLwObLOC9IiEfI+YKspeX0caU9dP gz5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531o7DJsca3UAKs4HuhSSJDKjQrxYHVdr9k4nlZSK1K8yDI+V4TG 9KwQf4VJThloQRrOibjh56DdPNr79qrOi4XH X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlhecMj2wzzBsphhiUmchwo2XsFfSqBiqa52DqZkvnE/l+9sOUhsC0Q+A5rjUQiPODMLGkIw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d56:: with SMTP id dz22mr1047620edb.291.1639424688886; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com. [209.85.221.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id sg17sm6085259ejc.72.2021.12.13.11.44.47 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id k9so11108125wrd.2 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:cc8d:: with SMTP id p13mr611346wrj.274.1639424687470; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211210053743.GA36420@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20211213083154.GA20853@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:44:31 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [fget] 054aa8d439: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -5.7% regression To: Carel Si Cc: Jann Horn , Miklos Szeredi , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, kernel test robot , fengwei.yin@intel.com, stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:37 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So I'll just apply the patch. Thanks for the report and the testing Done, it's commit e386dfc56f83 ("fget: clarify and improve __fget_files() implementation") in my tree now. I didn't mark it as "Fixes:" or for stable, because I can't imagine that it matters in real life. But then it struck me that Greg has mentioned that he ends up getting a lot of performance regression reports for people testing stable and they can be distracting. So I'm adding a stable cc here just so people are aware of this as a "yeah, will-it-scale.poll2 performance regression has been reported, has a fix available if somebody cares". Linus