From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E3DC7619B for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC825206F4 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:08:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581916119; bh=JM9jWkCDPYYzza1+V+NI8eULjB0Xvy2zTYjan55pPY8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=T3hUVddMyE+ZZxSZeAscztWeq4WTQQQZ8w0DiFDKf1+ZjveRuJXA3qQP0RAs9oJxJ jl9HyWsyJu9y4bZuY1ZuHTs/hSrmywklt3VUJsfTLIQypLSyjq7cmuZBHwEhaOYe6J cOE78S/orexHij0cIXPg2PiYJUd0hMlx6wiTeur8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725985AbgBQFIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:08:38 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:36193 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725280AbgBQFIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:08:38 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id r19so17268414ljg.3 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qcgi3kuYWT+F97MMSY9Af1xrTLZcSD8KEgx4I86REZQ=; b=V0CNo2wKtLMflqcZ3QN5b6cM5ItqRqI6/fRPOVs31VlDzbS/0QsFhAC1QURo5bQx5e pW2VLt3NagHcaRjpB1KmFY9gqBoy0kvZhm6PhTgwrOHIEgVxZWmnWmqvtCGkTmqt22gH q6oCMSYvx/Fg1m9ZdMSXVb/eP5Q/SmH5SrBtw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qcgi3kuYWT+F97MMSY9Af1xrTLZcSD8KEgx4I86REZQ=; b=m+GxHJ0NIt53q5af9mdxvcVmJedNHR8DI4Gd4Ya4YNHm0FuzlwPPTeomUVjlD5RpiH fnUAmd+vbNedu2hWtKQqVpCtVHREZCojB4MlhfCdl6ssdep//7fNJuMkgo3aslBe1+2D qid5oOXc5qqFYJAK7NMdii54mCo0hSnAWu8qiAvPOk+dlJF9K7WHscCwgfkgdy1LYJGW hRRGyGmat0UTke0CQ4Qd0e9DUjnLJ3kVVePo+sMXoDgaKrqDtmBerjJ2GJhT9omW3hAz ubs9jAT0iOlGEa/5fdL7uzBY+deAiyt1FRpxgGtRubgtDLBVDWrHkNCB09HfZjrOt9bL H51g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYLt+NhrVD2lZ08u6NabB3lT+0xZjgksGRys6IfxE5yzs8mB9+ bYqtkHxBihvxSSIcIIBBcoY3ZFi6F6M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTLapBAj4AoKSVPBYxRHwqvQy+XNXURF+4rq4ZbRwxYARh5tiGXfgwZSL2qxPP9FUyTNSIiw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3619:: with SMTP id d25mr8579383lja.231.1581916115569; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com. [209.85.208.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f9sm7812881ljp.62.2020.02.16.21.08.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d10so17285378ljl.9 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:909a:: with SMTP id l26mr8503500ljg.209.1581916114301; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200217020840.GA24821@codemonkey.org.uk> <8025e1bf-4834-83c6-d12c-4e817f875776@toxicpanda.com> In-Reply-To: <8025e1bf-4834-83c6-d12c-4e817f875776@toxicpanda.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:08:18 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 5.6-rc2 To: Josef Bacik Cc: Dave Jones , Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:02 PM Josef Bacik wrote: > > I assume Filipe wrote this based on my patch here > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git/commit/?id=c821555d2b9733d8f483c9e79481c7209e1c1fb0 > > which makes it so we can allocate safely in this context, but that patch hasn't > made it's way to you yet. Do you want it now? It was prep for a much less safe > patchset, but is fine by itself. Thanks, I assume it's either that, or revert 28553fa992cb and do it differently.. I'll leave that whole decision to the btrfs people who actually know the code and the situations and what the alternative would look like... Linus