From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: paul.burton@mips.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>,
"Samuel Neves" <sneves@dei.uc.pt>,
"Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Jean-Philippe Aumasson" <jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com>,
"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
jhogan@kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 06/20] zinc: ChaCha20 MIPS32r2 implementation
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:19:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rm9dqa6wtBDLngdXfv+3DCCsgM51z9nbGg3Bb_Q_zdwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180918202549.ogfyunppxaha7sfu@pburton-laptop>
Hi Paul,
Thanks a bunch for the review.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:25 PM Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> wrote:
> Should this be .set reorder?
Nice catch. Fixed here:
https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=23d97fc333cf85dd07445a9d21a28cbef47c553c
But then...
> Even better - could we not just place the addiu before the bne & drop
> the .set noreorder, allowing the assembler to fill the delay slot with
> the addiu? Likewise in many other places throughout the patch.
>
> That would be more future proof - particularly if we ever want to adjust
> this for use with the nanoMIPS ISA which has no delay slots. It may also
> allow the assembler the choice to use compact branches (ie. branches
> without visible delay slots) when targeting MIPS32r6. I know neither of
> these will currently build this code, but I think avoiding all the
> noreorder blocks would be a nice cleanup just for the sake of
> readability anyway.
Great idea. Rene has committed that here:
https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=5c153a59ac3aa58a3ff17c69fee63d599e5f2758
These will be in the v6 patchset whenever that's posted, and it's
already been merged into the dev tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/linux.git/log/?h=jd/wireguard
Regards,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 16:16 [PATCH net-next v5 00/20] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/20] asm: simd context helper API Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/20] zinc: introduce minimal cryptography library Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-20 15:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-20 16:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-20 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-21 0:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-21 3:12 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-21 3:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-21 3:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-21 4:15 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-21 4:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-21 4:32 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-21 4:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-22 16:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-25 7:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-25 14:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-21 0:17 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-25 10:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-25 14:44 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/20] zinc: ChaCha20 generic C implementation and selftest Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 1:08 ` Eric Biggers
2018-09-19 2:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19 2:14 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 6:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-19 11:33 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/20] zinc: ChaCha20 ARM and ARM64 implementations Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/20] zinc: ChaCha20 MIPS32r2 implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 20:25 ` Paul Burton
2018-09-20 13:19 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/20] zinc: Poly1305 generic C implementations and selftest Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 0:50 ` Eric Biggers
2018-09-19 1:35 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 4:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-19 11:50 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 12:26 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 1:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 1:41 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/20] zinc: Poly1305 x86_64 implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/20] zinc: Poly1305 ARM and ARM64 implementations Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 22:55 ` Eric Biggers
2018-09-19 0:17 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/20] zinc: Poly1305 MIPS32r2 and MIPS64 implementations Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/20] zinc: ChaCha20Poly1305 construction and selftest Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/20] zinc: BLAKE2s generic C implementation " Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 0:41 ` Eric Biggers
2018-09-19 0:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/20] zinc: BLAKE2s x86_64 implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 14/20] zinc: Curve25519 generic C implementations and selftest Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 15/20] zinc: Curve25519 x86_64 implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 16/20] zinc: Curve25519 ARM implementation Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 17/20] crypto: port Poly1305 to Zinc Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 18/20] crypto: port ChaCha20 " Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 19/20] security/keys: rewrite big_key crypto to use Zinc Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH net-next v5 20/20] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 23:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-19 2:04 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 12:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-09-18 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next v5 19/20] security/keys: rewrite big_key crypto to use Zinc David Howells
2018-09-18 17:12 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-18 18:28 ` [PATCH net-next v5 00/20] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel Ard Biesheuvel
2018-09-18 21:01 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-09-19 17:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHmME9rm9dqa6wtBDLngdXfv+3DCCsgM51z9nbGg3Bb_Q_zdwg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opensource@vdorst.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sneves@dei.uc.pt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).