From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B741C07E95 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318D6610CC for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230513AbhGTSFX (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:05:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44592 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229818AbhGTSEf (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:04:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170C4C061574 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id m68so20989703qke.7 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h+5lhU7M8IjaNDliv1AGOCjbrZiTwbIiNZC3cRm5Ft4=; b=kBNqGrqVO0AGRsiaL21hT9uj8jYrP1RH/zUuBTrpbBUb8A42hHHzVHzCvjT3dJ+Ty9 yVNDKRMFvYehXW+I9SqWnToG1znHK9qyAECiy7F0h2h5UkSiMrAyD1iqLfcHmIRzqBa3 3gLxomE2ztzKfdxeg1Dh4QidNGCiIfjBswBQkZ+D/owBOrYD/eqpSPrICPG/l2YXwhbz 5Isa8wx3gsFgKoqDQmVfhIzKAQrNd0RLyOctfy3RpnRQJNWfmIzPwCt+VZOzjvbzpTqB PBkyGWSERoggfMqSRyQ2NYYmATiMWki7J0f+6OrXNWlGNm/0LPY1LZPNdt730Ui4K1R5 7yeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h+5lhU7M8IjaNDliv1AGOCjbrZiTwbIiNZC3cRm5Ft4=; b=bnQDVK2Nk9QfgKRl2x/YHF6L4zXzDDqLPoDfepGMHYo1yCSofYm25khMhcwHPPQKmR RxaOXShO7PhmFkoy6/dv68/px/Mkwdjdl5bkaKj7T2dblvOWusnDD+oo5yUtL8DPWLDi AUfLMVEWSqaLBYPxEhldvIxqJzkP7dt803AkNgQC4n4sHy9TQTs7IiEQbil4czQtswqh MBWz7Yc3esaY2P0hdcZw1+hh/TXYl7vhuFbFeEKlDIspBJJbulLQdWVeCNKkr1uEL523 skL22rJVA45OKU48+xAJO2xS0X6InmX6pklRlU4SV/215/e8vhuySgwo1V5K1kYrn047 /JCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ot7ypzpRch4hfhnHBN6cNTuY5tOF+Tp30bb7P6oY3A9HhuOni 8UBNuVZCXGVAewkisatTIrv+SkRH6aXFHvXLy1eM1Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz99PqGqDiAUjrgTCjXK83j0Ii/6/WjrhhzASEWUjObSqCXnA+g3kTJMOWUTIM3pS0bEje2lpMgJ/Z6UUAhjFU= X-Received: by 2002:a37:8f44:: with SMTP id r65mr31378302qkd.20.1626806704872; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:45:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210709043713.887098-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <20210709043713.887098-5-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <874kcz33g5.wl-maz@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <874kcz33g5.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Joel Fernandes Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:44:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: add host pv-vcpu-state support To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Will Deacon , Suleiman Souhlal , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:24 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > [...] > > +} > > + > > +static inline bool > > +kvm_arm_is_vcpu_state_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch) > > +{ > > + return (vcpu_arch->vcpu_state.base != GPA_INVALID); > > +} > > + > > +void kvm_update_vcpu_preempted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool preempted); > > + > > void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome); > > > > struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr); > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > > index 989bb5dad2c8..2a3ee82c6d90 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile > > @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += hyp/ > > > > kvm-y := $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o \ > > $(KVM)/vfio.o $(KVM)/irqchip.o $(KVM)/binary_stats.o \ > > - arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o perf.o hypercalls.o pvtime.o \ > > + arm.o mmu.o mmio.o psci.o perf.o hypercalls.o \ > > + pvtime.o pv-vcpu-state.o \ > > inject_fault.o va_layout.o handle_exit.o \ > > guest.o debug.o reset.o sys_regs.o \ > > vgic-sys-reg-v3.o fpsimd.o pmu.o \ > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > index e9a2b8f27792..43e995c9fddb 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(vcpu); > > > > kvm_arm_pvtime_vcpu_init(&vcpu->arch); > > + kvm_arm_vcpu_state_init(&vcpu->arch); > > > > vcpu->arch.hw_mmu = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu; > > > > @@ -429,10 +430,12 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) > > if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) > > vcpu_ptrauth_disable(vcpu); > > kvm_arch_vcpu_load_debug_state_flags(vcpu); > > + kvm_update_vcpu_preempted(vcpu, false); > > } > > > > void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > { > > + kvm_update_vcpu_preempted(vcpu, true); > > This doesn't look right. With this, you are now telling the guest that > a vcpu that is blocked on WFI is preempted. This really isn't the > case, as it has voluntarily entered a low-power mode while waiting for > an interrupt. Indeed, the vcpu isn't running. A physical CPU wouldn't > be running either. Can that be cured by just checking vcpu->preempted before calling kvm_update_vcpu_preempted() ? - Joel