Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM,  <fu.wei@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
>
> This patch adds support for parsing arch timer in GTDT,
> provides some kernel APIs to parse all the PPIs and
> always-on info in GTDT and export them.
>
> By this driver, we can simplify arm_arch_timer drivers, and
> separate the ACPI GTDT knowledge from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig           |   5 ++
>  drivers/acpi/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig     |  15 ++++
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile    |   1 +
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/acpi.h           |   6 ++
>  6 files changed, 198 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index b7e2e77..1cdc7d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -521,4 +521,9 @@ config XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION
>
>  endif
>
> +if ARM64
> +source "drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig"
> +
> +endif
> +
>  endif  # ACPI
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index 251ce85..1a94ff7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -99,5 +99,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_EXTLOG)     += acpi_extlog.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_OPREGION)    += pmic/intel_pmic.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CRC_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_crc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_xpower.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64)    += arm64/
>
>  video-objs                     += acpi_video.o video_detect.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ff5c253
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +#
> +# ACPI Configuration for ARM64
> +#
> +
> +menu "The ARM64-specific ACPI Support"
> +
> +config ACPI_GTDT
> +       bool "ACPI GTDT table Support"

This should depend on ARM64.

Also I wonder if it needs to be user-selectable?  Wouldn't it be
better to enable it by default when building for ARM64 with ACPI?

> +       help
> +         GTDT (Generic Timer Description Table) provides information
> +         for per-processor timers and Platform (memory-mapped) timers
> +         for ARM platforms. Select this option to provide information
> +         needed for the timers init.
> +
> +endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..466de6b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT)                += acpi_gtdt.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9ee977d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
> +/*
> + * ARM Specific GTDT table Support
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
> + * Author: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> + *         Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
> + *         Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
> +
> +#undef pr_fmt
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "GTDT: " fmt

I would add "ACPI" to the prefix too if I were you, but that's me.

> +
> +typedef struct {
> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt;
> +       void *platform_timer_start;
> +       void *gtdt_end;
> +} acpi_gtdt_desc_t;
> +
> +static acpi_gtdt_desc_t acpi_gtdt_desc __initdata;
> +
> +static inline void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> +
> +       platform_timer += gh->length;
> +       if (platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end)
> +               return platform_timer;
> +
> +       return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#define for_each_platform_timer(_g)                            \
> +       for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start; _g;      \
> +            _g = next_platform_timer(_g))
> +
> +static inline bool is_timer_block(void *platform_timer)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> +
> +       if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       return false;

This is just too much code.  It would suffice to do

    return gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK;

> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_watchdog(void *platform_timer)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> +
> +       if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_WATCHDOG)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       return false;

Just like above.

> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get some basic info from GTDT table, and init the global variables above
> + * for all timers initialization of Generic Timer.
> + * This function does some validation on GTDT table.
> + */
> +static int __init acpi_gtdt_desc_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = container_of(table,
> +                                                   struct acpi_table_gtdt,
> +                                                   header);
> +
> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt = gtdt;
> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end = (void *)table + table->length;
> +
> +       if (table->revision < 2) {
> +               pr_info("Revision:%d doesn't support Platform Timers.\n",
> +                       table->revision);

Is it really useful to print this message (and the one below) at the
"info" level?  What about changing them to pr_debug()?

> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!gtdt->platform_timer_count) {
> +               pr_info("No Platform Timer.\n");
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start = (void *)gtdt +
> +                                             gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
> +       if (acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start <
> +           (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
> +               pr_err(FW_BUG "Platform Timer pointer error.\n");

Why pr_err()?

> +               acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start = NULL;
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return gtdt->platform_timer_count;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init map_generic_timer_interrupt(u32 interrupt, u32 flags)
> +{
> +       int trigger, polarity;
> +
> +       if (!interrupt)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       trigger = (flags & ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_MODE) ? ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE
> +                       : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
> +
> +       polarity = (flags & ACPI_GTDT_INTERRUPT_POLARITY) ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW
> +                       : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
> +
> +       return acpi_register_gsi(NULL, interrupt, trigger, polarity);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Map the PPIs of per-cpu arch_timer.
> + * @type: the type of PPI
> + * Returns 0 if error.
> + */
> +int __init acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(int type)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt;
> +
> +       switch (type) {
> +       case PHYS_SECURE_PPI:
> +               return map_generic_timer_interrupt(gtdt->secure_el1_interrupt,
> +                                                  gtdt->secure_el1_flags);
> +       case PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI:
> +               return map_generic_timer_interrupt(gtdt->non_secure_el1_interrupt,
> +                                                  gtdt->non_secure_el1_flags);
> +       case VIRT_PPI:
> +               return map_generic_timer_interrupt(gtdt->virtual_timer_interrupt,
> +                                                  gtdt->virtual_timer_flags);
> +
> +       case HYP_PPI:
> +               return map_generic_timer_interrupt(gtdt->non_secure_el2_interrupt,
> +                                                  gtdt->non_secure_el2_flags);
> +       default:
> +               pr_err("ppi type error.\n");
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * acpi_gtdt_c3stop - got c3stop info from GTDT
> + *
> + * Returns 1 if the timer is powered in deep idle state, 0 otherwise.
> + */
> +int __init acpi_gtdt_c3stop(void)

Why not bool?

> +{
> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt;
> +
> +       return !(gtdt->non_secure_el1_flags & ACPI_GTDT_ALWAYS_ON);
> +}
> +
> +int __init gtdt_arch_timer_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> +{
> +       if (table)
> +               return acpi_gtdt_desc_init(table);
> +
> +       pr_err("table pointer error.\n");

This message is totally unuseful.

> +
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}

What is supposed to be calling this function?

> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 288fac5..8439579 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,12 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle);
>  struct platform_device *acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *);
>  #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr) (_ptr)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT
> +int __init gtdt_arch_timer_init(struct acpi_table_header *table);
> +int __init acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(int type);
> +int __init acpi_gtdt_c3stop(void);

The __init thing is not necessary here.

> +#endif
> +
>  #else  /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>
>  #define acpi_disabled 1
> --

Thanks,
Rafael