From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A4C433E1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC8D2177B for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="PoP10f4t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728540AbgHERWU (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:22:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51980 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728787AbgHERTt (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:19:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80480C06179E for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id bs17so14360555edb.1 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ggWm0T5pBn7JnigTAPRbmUTfRdvzxQl+mpQ72rR0fUs=; b=PoP10f4tjqT5dS5d/uwUo+sqOTBfpYa07l9Dp61aeW+rv082Wx5BtKN+1bCLsTJF1U nUbzGtQNIwu2lxwjJRDipJ2qANYW9dxqDIcqBjZ++7ZQUP3W/BTxTY/e3PVATg5z5PlD fovDZooeuStLnEv4MVI4Zsu2xoFIEnyOrC3BQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ggWm0T5pBn7JnigTAPRbmUTfRdvzxQl+mpQ72rR0fUs=; b=SySxZlpCA7agqkNIJQhdPhliit9cq1TjTiVDgnirMcAbf8K/RZUQFogtTiDPkQ2CeB OPGt3tR1r2rATtDCHqD6lfwnqI+m3Gnx8TKH0x6tRtXd6IzyrYCYTOqxgoSSd8MDN1BV j/GZKuCllge5lk2M1OofG3fsSlOxBw4MtnbzNEujDnM29vYYisZUQ2pnHsf7OMScst79 DUebqOvRBFYKAE23RdbsLuLmLvXb+Kx0XjGQMAiH2zefRw5syX2f1wAOHBXdFQJhXGDK ayzr/V1fuCDisms7lo7lcr3/Zq2sjVHviwQW3hs2mUnAVIbv2LCNrYEmP1QyDY4mnTGQ vVgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wFhjnD63Kv0gOmHqeGNjc1TJ/KW4axkbzIWx5ghs7NVevv8R6 n8a+H6jdHL3Nnl0XZrt4vpDYdD5h8tfdZNW9K9xzXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDf4TG2ZDbOcy/ueJc/nhD6cuCUKJp/4SEeu6p3T512+TCDX0Q15WYk1mR9VBwMmf6ImGgphnQt/h+li9HEKQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:12c4:: with SMTP id k4mr288635edx.358.1596647986830; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:19:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <159646178122.1784947.11705396571718464082.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <159646185371.1784947.14555585307218856883.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20200804133817.GD32719@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com> <2316806.1596641851@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <2316806.1596641851@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] fsinfo: Allow mount topology and propagation info to be retrieved [ver #21] To: David Howells Cc: Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Ian Kent , Miklos Szeredi , Christian Brauner , Jann Horn , "Darrick J. Wong" , Karel Zak , Jeff Layton , Linux API , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LSM , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:37 PM David Howells wrote: > > Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > + __u32 shared_group_id; /* Shared: mount group ID */ > > > + __u32 dependent_source_id; /* Dependent: source mount group ID */ > > > + __u32 dependent_clone_of_id; /* Dependent: ID of mount this was cloned from */ > > > > Another set of ID's that are currently 32bit *internally* but that doesn't > > mean they will always be 32 bit. > > > > And that last one (apart from "slave" being obfuscated) > > I had "slave" in there. It got objected to. See > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 4. > > > is simply incorrect. It has nothing to do with cloning. It's the "ID of > > the closest peer group in the propagation chain that has a representative > > mount in the current root". > > You appear to be in disagreement with others that I've asked. Read the code. Thanks, Miklos