From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F0FC43441 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EFE2082B for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 02:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="AA1vtLEO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 90EFE2082B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727072AbeJKKO4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:14:56 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([210.131.2.90]:33722 "EHLO conssluserg-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726788AbeJKKO4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:14:56 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f176.google.com (mail-vk1-f176.google.com [209.85.221.176]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id w9B2nZLd009253; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:49:36 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com w9B2nZLd009253 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1539226176; bh=O6asAfJP/j+X0cjMsjSrt6LkPwVxdbC5KEByL14TL9I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=AA1vtLEO7t3c7T1yKg8UHYSlP/og3v9H3ol1z1bUgrTVYSI4exjjf8V3/z5ZEvTS+ GoOIlvBY/Jw2iTW/uhy5Yka1oj0E3bN/IzXoJScTvduIw4ZMWBqVPmFTGla6UBC3UZ Mv+0HWL93biex02dnGWy7QnFAkJtZED2DWzz4Ep0Mjn26RICCrAHbXt4ig03WbMmm2 Mj9c76eSDIXmnJ6Av5bwFbQtxLdmy9uThaOYFFFEf+au3jql6CN6P6Yf9UjK2S6jYE X7BxNVW261k3VlOltHXUetBfrigQgZD2yCs6HcC+1U+/YqOoCMlrYPLeVGN90//Hwm q8ajtL2NMAQQw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.221.176] Received: by mail-vk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id l186so1182681vke.0; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:49:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohQEGS8sdXcixOhR97cY5ccP7K0ZDchviwjcV9iaFixJpHodCSe XFYvpe5g69qO4OSmZS+du6ekEivGPnVvp0VrQfo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63Z/9VlNHe66cnMm01zcgkjBLcYM4TwB+UbGhBW/sisxGRkEosx9o2OmmlUiH7jAmisnYjOOpJS/N9wVo67u/g= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:cd3:: with SMTP id 202-v6mr14153302vkm.74.1539226175253; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 19:49:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <84cf6ae0-97c8-6b73-ca86-b3d3b3daba5b@pobox.com> <8d5cf8c6-556a-96a1-610d-c92355783a9f@pobox.com> <20180926180019.GD22824@google.com> <20180926184259.GB14797@kroah.com> <20180926190303.GA18293@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:48:59 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] compiler.h: give up __compiletime_assert_fallback() To: Kees Cook Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Joel Stanley , Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Matthias Kaehlcke , Linus Torvalds , Christopher Li , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Daniel Santos , Chris Wilson , jani.nikula@intel.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:51 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Miguel Ojeda > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:12 AM Joel Stanley wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 05:07, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > > >> > Yeah, that's what I'd linked to in the patchwork URL. Andrew, can you take this? > >> > >> clang built -next is blowing up now that Kees' -Wvla patch has been > >> included. This patch fixes it. > >> > >> Kees, perhaps it should go in your tree along side of the -Wvla patch > >> if no one else wants to take it? > >> > > > > I can take it along in the compiler attributes tree, since that > > touches the compiler*.h stuff. Although that would make it > > not-only-attributes, i.e. slightly lying :-) > > Oh, I had assumed Masahiro was going to carry it. No, I am not. Putting all sort of things into kbuild basket is painful for me. > If that's not true, > sure I'll pick it up as part of my VLA "series". -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada