From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8479C33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEC9214AF for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728993AbgAOOWM (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:22:12 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:59397 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726440AbgAOOWL (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:22:11 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com ([209.85.222.174]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue107 [212.227.15.145]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MGQzj-1isYVr058v-00Gsh0; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:22:10 +0100 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id w127so15722566qkb.11; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:22:09 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXR0i/nw4VXfnZSlejgh4fZ2a2KfRmGN3E0gfmq0ia8/P+hmmF9 nUgpg7FpHYLLd9n7RfJ6jP2V9rSvBIfoZNJXwig= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxx2a39ERgImZn16gvReU3L59K4NPZ7rVI6r40qbh59bC6C4RPdM9GIKIPaH4dZYMYOAUlFtEAF/+VlIcIk3y8= X-Received: by 2002:a37:84a:: with SMTP id 71mr26665185qki.138.1579098128765; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:22:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200114200846.29434-1-vgupta@synopsys.com> <20200114200846.29434-2-vgupta@synopsys.com> <20200115141224.GH8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20200115141224.GH8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:21:52 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] asm-generic/uaccess: don't define inline functions if noinline lib/* in use To: Al Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Vineet Gupta , Khalid Aziz , Andrey Konovalov , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Christian Brauner , Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , Aleksa Sarai , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lOdPcxVLcqBDEULU954wg+G6L5Re6fTjFN9BhJpfuxlRd4a6lR4 hSIHFUtdbK3ItxmH/gNZwHTsPniOPTxj8q4g7Sg0TRgVIJ6HXkYStxhPEdlWHRWJx0NTd6E OxbYloa5u0vc2cQ6fMPG/0QbTP86Gp5Uos7Lg0pAXCuXVJiKHIMZ3Qg6vGklUWDrQWN2vns sBNaMcqUkwpiZFr+TVQyA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:CF8ls0Li9nE=:0MP2x6I/juuYaHyvrvutA8 koVW/HnYbXl2tpLoFALXNeZfBM5113zZ8Ayl/3ikXDiU/QHlN9J5C5SCxopTPPo6rCXtjZuca x8T4cGpQcfaMZZZzCC69/9QnAge+YPkrV+/W6VV9Aw1eReYevymbqxiex9ZpYS4NCB+2Erwed f6jpOZ871xncuQ/P8En2WW0rmfMPF5DGO36DlhrCTnnFPm9j6s1E6I7A1Lbv5guEKzT1tHFTJ WQksl+GzfN1mJm1pnoYTAFLL986qEAazRPgiNbBnC5vrPxXq3qFpT04ZLHYIkSiixBpjs4e5B mv4RwRnFDsS5ttwrri1+T86vzIPkPpD6hgrR/Q4lzJNJ08FR1ATxCmP9qPC2Z2m7RYjUe/MhV 7/s0ZU7urU6DhTCW+K4nZ3m/y2rWn5cRxFvxiap+gSy2s+Ebo3kkp5h/8ch+q5Tx+oseHxPjZ eB1BYo8ZiWiXpRIFQy4dLV1VM5Mzg+6p+XD3qP57OfBPfGu7Qs7Fzi1MWUgqYsw4cCK4Gpdxn Kw3jNjW5bUpRqUo/VaoybI+scr5qkj4yWd9KVIPhH7AEfuazB3UjcjlZkjSPCSjvjxcyhK333 Wa2qeI6A4Q1yUWyTKTk0AeJ81EWpW974NPQ/GvlPcAc9ngeSVqOirIf0b/wT+So7drFt8p5GA bxn8mgQoYkMujjGtxtd3+jF+7sai+OMd7U25qSbYiZacNTkjL/yWtz4AOWjD3NmGhve83yENZ zOR2K1+0vcO0OodorvBFWrn1RK4aWHHoutumI9F6WcCTxibQBCsxVF9z7RVGs4R7WxRYUsZ9H ZsHLQQtCPfUiE/Eth87r5mQBFylEmP78wQ/G1XbvTBnwMpBz6N236SWxlg3NIDdQqyZqzywa3 ODWOzLDMV5qW2FYUVIqw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Al Viro wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I would suggest that anybody who uses asm-generic/uaccess.h needs to > > > simply use the generic library version. > > > > Or possibly just everybody altogether: the remaining architectures that > > have a custom implementation don't seem to be doing any better either. > > No go for s390. There you really want to access userland memory in > larger chunks - it's oriented for block transfers. IIRC, the insn > they are using has a costly setup phase, independent of the amount > to copy, followed by reasonably fast transfer more or less linear > by the size. Right, I missed that one while looking through the remaining implementations. Arnd