From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91888C433FF for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED23206E0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730179AbfG3MZE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:25:04 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:33510 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729973AbfG3MZB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:25:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id r6so58534480qtt.0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vg24wzBIc+D+Hmv+R1GPqhgrmLOPVkmrpAuvjDtlIDU=; b=HTYpVHgcKfw3qjT7bgNIzF/J064+hCL62azBCtPvqrMGTRWJRTfa6OmXjl5UGTjfUB TAYx0n8THuIxaZ2BHWbEem7UeZRBj7KdlVi5MX5ukq0sXke3CfqEKyKL7LeRA3aj7clv kzSjyme9g1lpQfunxAWBWySJihV45rpoRFczqTwhzUKluKi3Y1YE6MUDUnxc1fHepAuw ycH4PXHjWBkG1fu5qYxoEgtcq+YC0PYytoJsB1YFkCq4hiG3mOuYa2FSrk8mJgm2oWYt VmLYEc59uDmG57w43gtvWdWmQFUt+HVPPAzV0+Tc94eZExyo4bWpje0VAxfmmj8Is1Gy lM6w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbxBNyGD9pfU9i8c6L6kjo4yuTSUEJq+U9KuzJpPF3UljuaLYa UIndKqTnVJVOTzDeAiJ+9pHxPOCou8LRJlo9RyM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfoZoBuiAjwAqXgbVNXXKwoEiH6dY5V72EFZ3ka6brjjn9cMP5XNNFWJ1mx1f3K5mwNQb5H6XBvPEoDQjUWN0= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ba2c:: with SMTP id w44mr81948752qvf.62.1564489499864; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 05:24:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform? To: Wan ZongShun Cc: Linux ARM , Linus Walleij , Russell King , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Avi Fishman , Tomer Maimon , Tali Perry , Patrick Venture , Nancy Yuen , Benjamin Fair , OpenBMC Maillist Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > As the mach-netx and mach-8695 platforms are being removed now, > > I wonder whether we should do the same with w90x00: Here is what > > I found after looking at the git history and external material for it. > > > > - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed > > by the manufacturer > > > > - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x) > > that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never > > submitted for upstream inclusion. > > > > - Wan ZongShun is listed as maintainer, but the last patch he wrote > > was in 2011. > > > > - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards > > are cleanups that were apparently done without access to > > test hardware. > > > > - The http://www.mcuos.com/ website listed in the MAINTAINERS > > file is no longer reachable. > > Recipient inbox full > > Your message couldn't be delivered to mcuos.com@gmail.com. Their inbox is full, or it's getting too much mail right now. Yes, that too. Arnd